DevHeads.net

Kirigami in Frameworks

Hi all,
The Kirigami component set always was targeted to be eventually released as a
framework, ideally tier 1. since a framework must depend at most from 2 Qt
releases before the current one, it couldn't be released there yet.
Now that Qt 5.9 is released, i would like to propose to move Kirigami in
frameworks, to be relased in the main release cycle, and stop standalone
releases from extragear.

It strictly depends just from Qt stuff, so should be tier 1 (at runtime it can
use optional styles that use features from Plasma, tough not having plasma
installed doesn't touch its functionality in any part, if this ends up being a
problem, i can move that style into plasma-integration)

Comments

Re: Kirigami in Frameworks

By Marco Martin at 06/21/2017 - 10:00

As there were no replies for quite a while, i assume there are no
particular objections.

so, how to proceed? what needs to be doe to do the actual move?

On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Marco Martin < ... at gmail dot com> wrote:

Re: Kirigami in Frameworks

By Jonathan Riddell at 06/21/2017 - 12:22

On 21 June 2017 at 15:00, Marco Martin < ... at gmail dot com> wrote:
Does it comply with the policies (as much as they are relevant for QML)?
<a href="https://community.kde.org/Frameworks/Policies" title="https://community.kde.org/Frameworks/Policies">https://community.kde.org/Frameworks/Policies</a>

Get David Faure to give his approval then see what the reponse to my
"who is authorised to move repos around?" thead is.
<a href="https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&amp;m=149806172721190&amp;w=2" title="https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&amp;m=149806172721190&amp;w=2">https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&amp;m=149806172721190&amp;w=2</a>

Jonathan

Re: Kirigami in Frameworks

By Marco Martin at 06/22/2017 - 09:51

On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 6:22 PM, Jonathan Riddell < ... at jriddell dot org> wrote:
yeah, it should for pretty much all rules

ok, waiting David's comment on it.