1708 ipa


I noticed a difference between ipa in and the src.rpm
used on

my guess is that the latest manual debranding was not pushed to git.

as a second item: any idea when we could have access to signed versions
of the src.rpms? I know that they might still change, but it would help
me for the redsleeve build effort if I had access to the current
(signed) set.



Re: 1708 ipa

By Jacco Ligthart at 08/12/2017 - 21:12

On 08/11/2017 12:13 PM, Jacco Ligthart wrote:

There is a similar issue with abrt. abrt as it is in git does not build.
it misses a "BuildRequires: dbus-glib-devel" and the last line of the
%configure ends in a "\". Now it thinks that "make -j4" is also a
configure flag.


Re: 1708 ipa

By Johnny Hughes at 08/15/2017 - 15:09

On 08/12/2017 08:12 PM, Jacco Ligthart wrote:
Those updates were setting in my local git unpushed. Now updated.

Re: 1708 ipa

By Johnny Hughes at 08/15/2017 - 15:17

On 08/15/2017 02:09 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
Actually ipa I can't push as there is another update after. I will push
the ipa changes to that update.

Re: 1708 ipa

By Fabian Arrotin at 08/11/2017 - 06:53

On 11/08/17 12:13, Jacco Ligthart wrote:
Hi Jacco, the .src.rpm are only signed and pushed to
after the distro was validated by QA and so released.

In the mean time, you can find ( as you did ) those on either (for x86_64) or (like
<a href="" title=""></a>
in this example)
But worth noting that both are also unsigned

Re: 1708 ipa

By Jacco Ligthart at 08/11/2017 - 18:48

On 11-08-17 12:53, Fabian Arrotin wrote: