DevHeads.net

Fedora

Reminder: Fedora 29 Beta Release Readiness meeting

Dear all,

Join us tomorrow on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-1 for the
Fedora 29 Beta Release Readiness meeting.

We will meet to make sure we are coordinated and ready for the Beta
release of Fedora 29. Please note that this meeting will be held even
if the release is delayed at the Go/No-Go meeting on the same day two
hours earlier.

You may receive this message several times in order to open this
meeting to the teams and to raise awareness, so hopefully more team
representatives will come to this meeting.

Reminder: Fedora 29 Beta Go/No-Go meeting

Dear all,

The Go/No-Go meeting for the Fedora 29 Beta release will be held
tomorrow — Thursday, 2018-09-13 — at 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1.
For more information, see:
<a href="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Go_No_Go_Meeting" title="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Go_No_Go_Meeting">https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Go_No_Go_Meeting</a>

View the meeting on Fedocal at
<a href="https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/Fedora%20release/2018/9/10/#m9338" title="https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/Fedora%20release/2018/9/10/#m9338">https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/Fedora%20release/2018/9/10/#m9338</a>

Fedora 29 Candidate Beta-1.1 Available Now!

According to the schedule [1], Fedora 29 Candidate Beta-1.1 is now
available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
testing!

Recommended platform: [] and version 2 format

Just sharing information.

When talking with a person in modularity team, I have told that for a
module config yaml file's below elements, the empty array "[]" was
recommended on Fedora.

/data/dependencies/buildrequires/platform
/data/dependencies/requires/platform

Because when platform is "[]", the module is built on current
supported platforms (right now f28, f29, and f30).

Fedora 29-20180911.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images.

Failed openQA tests: 3/132 (x86_64), 1/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)

ID: 278492 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/278492" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/278492">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/278492</a>
ID: 278508 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/278508" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/278508">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/278508</a>
ID: 278514 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/278514" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/278514">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/278514</a>
ID: 278588 Test: x86_64 universal install_iscsi
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/278588" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/278588">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/278588</a>
ID: 278607 Test: i386 univers

Fedora Rawhide-20180911.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images.

Failed openQA tests: 10/132 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)

New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180910.n.0):

ID: 278231 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_system_logging
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/278231" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/278231">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/278231</a>
ID: 278320 Test: x86_64 universal install_kickstart_firewall_configured
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/278320" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/278320">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/278320</a>

Old failures (same test failed in Rawhide-20180910.n.0):

ID: 278272 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/278272" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/278272">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/278272</a>
ID: 278278 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz i

Testing / feedback request: DNF 3 crashes

Hi folks!

Around the time DNF 3 landed in Rawhide (hence F29), we had quite a few
folks on these lists reporting issues, including crasher bugs. Many of
these seemed somehow related to the DNF history database.

Removing obsolete github repositories with module definitions

We have some obsolete github repositories [1] from the f26 and f27 period
we are no longer using. I feel like it might be confusing to people. So I'd
like to remove them all. Any objections?

[1] <a href="https://github.com/modularity-modules/" title="https://github.com/modularity-modules/">https://github.com/modularity-modules/</a>

Orphaning qt5-qtwebengine

Hi,

I have to bring some bad news to you: I unfortunately have to orphan the
qt5-qtwebengine package.

As you can see from the changelog, I have not been able to dedicate any time
to this package since March. (My last change was on 2018-03-18.) Yet, this
package needs a lot of care, because of the complex packaging and the
frequent security updates by upstream. (QtWebEngine had lately taken more of
my time than all my other packages combined!) Therefore, the only logical
consequence is that I have to resign from being the primary point of
contact.

Re: Am I allowed to package this?

You can pack kmods in copr , Fedora guidelines forbid kmods , I think , because they may be extremely insecure

Sent from my AndroidEm 10/09/2018 7:44 da tarde, Simo Sorce < ... at redhat dot com> escreveu:

Fedora Rawhide-20180910.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images.

Failed openQA tests: 12/132 (x86_64), 1/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)

New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180909.n.0):

ID: 277680 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/277680" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/277680">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/277680</a>
ID: 277733 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/277733" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/277733">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/277733</a>
ID: 277736 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_update_graphical
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/277736" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/277736">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/277736</a>
ID: 277738 Test: i386 KDE-live-iso install_default
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraprojec" title="https://openqa.fedoraprojec">https://openqa.fedoraprojec</a>

Fedora 29-20180910.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images.

Failed openQA tests: 7/132 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)

ID: 277513 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/277513" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/277513">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/277513</a>
ID: 277515 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/277515" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/277515">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/277515</a>
ID: 277531 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/277531" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/277531">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/277531</a>
ID: 277537 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/277537" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/277537">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/277537</a>
ID: 277553 Test: x86

Reminder meeting : Modularity Office Hours

Dear all,

You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Modularity Office Hours on 2018-09-11 from 10:00:00 to 11:00:00 US/Eastern
At <a href="mailto:fedora- ... at chat dot freenode.net">fedora- ... at chat dot freenode.net</a>

The meeting will be about:
This is where you ask the Fedora Modularity Team questions (and we try to answer them)!

Join us on [IRC](irc://chat.freenode.net/#fedora-modularity): #fedora-modularity on [FreeNode](<a href="https://freenode.net" title="https://freenode.net">https://freenode.net</a>)

Source: <a href="https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/5910/" title="https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/5910/">https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/5910/</a>

Fedora 29 compose report: 20180910.n.0 changes

===== SUMMARY =====
Added images: 1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages: 0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages: 0 B
Size of upgraded packages: 0 B
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages: 0 B
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

===== ADDED IMAGES =====
Image: Workstation raw-xz armhfp
Path: Workstation/armhfp/images/Fedora-Workstation-armhfp-29-20180910.n.0-sda.raw.xz

===== DROPPED IMAGES =====

===== ADDED PACKAGES =====

===== DROPPED PACKAGES ====

Intending to orphan "zorba"

Hi all,

I'm intending to orphan the "zorba" package. Upstream seems to have
stalled the development and in the last couple of months the number of
issues introduced by CMake updates increased. Also, the language
bindings haven't been ported to Python 3 yet. Currently zorba fails to
build for f29 again [1].
Since I don't use zorba any longer for my own work and, unfortunately,
don't have the time to keep the aging package in good shape, I decided
to drop it.

fedpkg clone doesn*t work

I tried

fedpkg clone lollypop

Cloning into 'lollypop'...
... at pkgs dot fedoraproject.org: Permission denied (publickey).
fatal: Could not read from remote repository.

Please make sure you have the correct access rights
and the repository exists.
Could not execute clone: Failed to execute command.

[martin@f28 fedora-scm]$ fedpkg clone lollypop
Cloning into 'lollypop'...
Enter passphrase for key '/home/martin/.ssh/id_rsa':
packet_write_wait: Connection to 209.132.181.4 port 22: Broken pipe
fatal: Could not read from remote repository.

Please make sure you have the correct access rights
an

Orphaning python-irclib

Hello.

I decided to orphan python-irclib.

Fedora 29-20180909.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images.

Failed openQA tests: 10/132 (x86_64), 1/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)

ID: 276839 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276839" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276839">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276839</a>
ID: 276849 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_cockpit
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276849" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276849">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276849</a>
ID: 276875 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276875" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276875">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276875</a>
ID: 276876 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276876" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276876">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276876</a>
ID: 276879 Test: x86_64 Workstation-bo

Fedora 29 compose report: 20180909.n.0 changes

===== SUMMARY =====
Added images: 2
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages: 0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages: 0 B
Size of upgraded packages: 0 B
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages: 0 B
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

===== ADDED IMAGES =====
Image: AtomicHost vagrant-virtualbox x86_64
Path: AtomicHost/x86_64/images/Fedora-AtomicHost-Vagrant-29-20180909.n.0.x86_64.vagrant-virtualbox.box
Image: AtomicHost vagrant-libvirt x86_64
Path: AtomicHo

nonresponsive asio maintainers

Hi list,

asio maintainers [1] seem to be unresponsive:

<a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551800" title="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551800">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551800</a>

I have checked the corresponding FAS accounts using fedora-active-user
and the maintainers do not appear to be very active:
- uwog: last FAS login 2017-01-05
- pocock: last FAS login 2017-05-07
- fale: last FAS login 2018-02-11

Does anybody know how to contact any of the 3 gentlemen?

Best regards,
Julian

[1] <a href="https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/asio" title="https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/asio">https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/asio</a>

Proposal to CANCEL: 2018-09-10 Fedora QA Meeting

Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting tomorrow. We're now
in F29 Beta crunch time, so that's the main focus. There will be a
blocker review meeting at 16:00 UTC, please come to that if you can.

If you're aware of anything important we have to discuss this week,
please do reply to this mail and we can go ahead and run the meeting.
Thanks!

F29 Call for testing: X crash when moving windows

Hi folks!

We have a proposed Beta blocker bug:

<a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1616269" title="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1616269">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1616269</a>

We are not sure whether to make it a blocker as we are not sure how
commonly it will affect people.

There actually seem to be a few different but similar bugs involved at
this point. It'd be great if folks could try the following operations:

1) Launch and then exit glxgears
2) Launch and then exit Chrome or Chromium
3) Launch Chrome or Chromium and then move its window around.

2018-09-10 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora 29 Blocker Review Meeting

# F29 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2018-09-10
# Time: 16:00 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net

Hi folks! We have 3 proposed Beta blockers and 21 proposed Beta freeze
exception to review, so let's have a review meeting tomorrow.

If you have time today, you can take a look at the proposed or
accepted blockers before the meeting - the full lists can be found
here: <a href="https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/" title="https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/">https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/</a> .

We'll be evaluating these bugs to see if they violate any of the
Release Criteria and warrant the blocking of a release if they're not
fixed.

Fedora Rawhide-20180909.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images.

Failed openQA tests: 76/132 (x86_64), 24/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)

Old failures (same test failed in Rawhide-20180908.n.0):

ID: 276675 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276675" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276675">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276675</a>
ID: 276676 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276676" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276676">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276676</a>
ID: 276678 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276678" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276678">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276678</a>
ID: 276679 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276679" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276679">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276679</a>
ID: 276

orphaned blueberry and bluez-tools

I don't use or have the time to maintain blueberry and bluez-tools so I have orphaned them.

pam_cgfs.so support for Fedora?

Has anyone looked at supporting pam_cgfs.so in Fedora.

This question was asked here.

<a href="https://github.com/containers/libpod/issues/1429" title="https://github.com/containers/libpod/issues/1429">https://github.com/containers/libpod/issues/1429</a>

Copr is DOWN

Please whoever can fix it asap, getting production downtime here.

Thanks,
Radka

Fedora 29-20180907.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images.

Failed openQA tests: 5/132 (x86_64), 1/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)

ID: 276511 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276511" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276511">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276511</a>
ID: 276512 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276512" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276512">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276512</a>
ID: 276515 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276515" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276515">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276515</a>
ID: 276518 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso install_default
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276518" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276518">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276518</a>
ID: 276527 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desk

Fedora Rawhide-20180908.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images.

Failed openQA tests: 77/132 (x86_64), 24/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)

New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180907.n.0):

ID: 276414 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_64bit
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276414" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276414">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276414</a>
ID: 276436 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_64bit
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276436" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276436">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276436</a>
ID: 276437 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_encrypted_64bit
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276437" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276437">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276437</a>
ID: 276447 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_encrypted_64bit
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests</a>

Fedora 29 compose report: 20180907.n.0 changes

===== SUMMARY =====
Added images: 0
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages: 1
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages: 195.26 KiB
Size of upgraded packages: 0 B
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages: 0 B
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

===== ADDED IMAGES =====

===== DROPPED IMAGES =====
Image: AtomicHost vagrant-virtualbox x86_64
Path: AtomicHost/x86_64/images/Fedora-AtomicHost-Vagrant-29-20180905.n.0.x86_64.vagrant-virtualbox.box
Image: AtomicHost va

Am I allowed to package this?

Hi all,
So, the other day I ordered a USB Wireless AC adapter for my pc, and I was
surprised to see that it didn't automatically start working.
After looking around, I came across this tutorial
<https://codarren.com/2018/04/tp-link-archer-t4u-2-4-5ghz-ubuntu-debian-setup/>that
mentioned this github page
<https://github.com/abperiasamy/rtl8812AU_8821AU_linux/>.

The driver installation worked, and the device runs.

So, I would like to package it for Fedora, but I am not sure if it is
allowed.

our manual un-orphaning process

Hi,

the manual un-orphaning process with rel-eng tickets is wasting
maintainer and rel-eng time and is very noisy (e.g. if more than one
person requests the package at the same time). With the upcoming
inevitable mass orphaning because of FTBFS and security bugs, the
this is going to be quite painful.

Is there any hope to automatize this? Allowing this to be done
through pagure would be great.

Looking for whom to pass the vessel for maitaining youtube-dl

Hi,

with change of my employer I don't use Fedora/RHEL for my
day-to-day work anymore and so I am loosing touch with the
actual state of packages here. Therefore, I would love to hand
over de facto maintainership of the youtube-dl package.

Updating it is really simple (just change the version and
%changelog, download new packages with spectool -g, and
rebuild), but it needs to be done quite often.

License change for rust-ryu

rust-ryu-0.2.6-1.fc30 has broadened its license from just "ASL 2.0" to
"ASL 2.0 or Boost".

Fedora 29 Beta blocker status mail #1

Hi folks! As we've only got a week to go for Beta, here's an update on
blocker bug status.

tl;dr action summary
====================

Accepted blockers
1. <a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1582524" title="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1582524">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1582524</a>
ACTION: QA / reporter to verify whether fixed in 3.2.0-2.fc29

2. <a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1596540" title="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1596540">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1596540</a>
ACTION: dnf team to fix bug and send out update

3. <a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1616167" title="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1616167">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1616167</a>
ACTION: FESCo to decide on how much fixing is needed

4.

Schedule for Monday's FESCo Meeting (2018-09-10)

The following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Monday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.

To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
<a href="http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto" title="http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto">http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto</a>

or run:
date -d '2018-09-10 15:00 UTC'

Links to all issues to be discussed can be found at:
<a href="https://pagure.io/fesco/report/meeting_agenda" title="https://pagure.io/fesco/report/meeting_agenda">https://pagure.io/fesco/report/meeting_agenda</a>

= Discussed and Voted in the Ticket =
F30 System-Wide Change: Mass Python 2 Package Removal
<a href="https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1975" title="https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1975">https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1975</a>
DECISION (+4, 1, -0)

F30 Change: Make ambiguous python shebangs error
<a href="https://pagure.io/fesco/" title="https://pagure.io/fesco/">https://pagure.io/fesco/</a>

FESCo Resgination

Hello all

I informed FESCo last week that I resigned from FESCo. They have
since asked that I do it publicly. It has again been an honor to
serve the Fedora community, however I resign effective immediately.

This in no way reflects anything other than my inability to fill the
role in the manner which I believe it requires.

Fedora Rawhide-20180907.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images.

Failed openQA tests: 78/132 (x86_64), 22/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)

New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180906.n.0):

ID: 275942 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/275942" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/275942">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/275942</a>
ID: 275945 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/275945" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/275945">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/275945</a>
ID: 275955 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_graphical
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/275955" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/275955">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/275955</a>
ID: 275961 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_updates_nfs
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/test" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/test">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/test</a>

Heads Up: python2 is marked as deprecated

In line with the "Mass Python 2 Package Removal" Fedora 30 Change [0],
we've just marked python2 and all it's subpackages as deprecated in
rawhide [1].

No new packages can depend on python2 except renames and FESCo/FPC
exceptions. See more info in the Guidelines for Deprecating Fedora
Packages [2].

[0] <a href="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Mass_Python_2_Package_Removal" title="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Mass_Python_2_Package_Removal">https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Mass_Python_2_Package_Removal</a>
[1]
<a href="https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python2/c/0052c9fa9d76e1706d96a17460ad26f331a4e0fe?branch=master" title="https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python2/c/0052c9fa9d76e1706d96a17460ad26f331a4e0fe?branch=master">https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python2/c/0052c9fa9d76e1706d96a17460a...</a>
[2] <a href="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Deprecating_Packages" title="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Deprecating_Packages">https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Deprecating_Packages</a>

Packages that need new maintainers

I've recently completed two nonresponsive maintainers policies.

<a href="https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1971" title="https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1971">https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1971</a>
<a href="https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1977" title="https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1977">https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1977</a>

Here are some packages that still need maintainers:

From <a href="https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1971:" title="https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1971:">https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1971:</a>

2048-cli
ColPack
GarminPlugin
NLopt
RxCpp
appmenu-qt5
arprec
checksec
dreamweb
dynaplugz
f23-backgrounds
fedorainfinity-backgrounds
freetiger
fstransform
garmintools
git-extras
gnome-shell-extension-dash-to-dock
gnome-shell-extension-disconnect-wifi
gnome-shell-extension-refresh-wifi
gnome-shell-extension-suspend-button
gnome-shell-extension-unite
hardening-wrapper

Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-09-07)

The following packages are orphaned or depend on an orphaned package
and will be retired, soon, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that
the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
<a href="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life" title="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life">https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life</a>

Note: If you received this mail directly you (co)maintain one of the affected
packages or a package that depends on one.

F28 updates-testing

Does anyone understand what most recent masher messages mean for F28 updates testing?

bodhi masher failed to mash f28-updates-testing 3 hours agobodhi masher successfully mashed f28-updates-testing 3 hours ago
Confusing...

Call for participation: Fedora Flatpaks

I'd like to invite Fedora contributors to start creating Flatpaks of
graphical applications in Fedora. We're still working on putting the final
pieces into place to have a complete story from end to end, but it's
definitely close enough to get started.

If you maintain a graphical application, please try creating a Flatpak of
it.

Fedora Rawhide-20180906.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images.

Failed openQA tests: 33/132 (x86_64), 2/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)

New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180904.n.0):

ID: 275452 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_replica
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/275452" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/275452">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/275452</a>
ID: 275514 Test: x86_64 universal install_arabic_language
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/275514" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/275514">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/275514</a>
ID: 275556 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_encrypted_64bit
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/275556" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/275556">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/275556</a>
ID: 275583 Test: i386 universal install_software_raid
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/</a>

Fedora 29-20180905.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images.

Failed openQA tests: 11/132 (x86_64), 4/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)

ID: 275005 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_replica
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/275005" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/275005">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/275005</a>
ID: 275015 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/275015" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/275015">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/275015</a>
ID: 275016 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/275016" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/275016">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/275016</a>
ID: 275030 Test: i386 Workstation-live-iso install_default
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/275030" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/275030">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/275030</a>
ID: 275040 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso b

Brainstorming about kernel updates with low disk space

I'd like to brainstorm a bit about how to make kernel updates more
resilient to running out of disk space.

Fedora 29 Beta Release Readiness meeting

Dear all,

Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-1 for the Fedora 29
Beta Release Readiness meeting. This meeting will be held on Thursday,
2018-09-13 at 19:00 UTC.

We will meet to make sure we are coordinated and ready for the Beta
release of Fedora 29. Please note that this meeting will be held even
if the release is delayed at the Go/No-Go meeting on the same day two
hours earlier.

You may receive this message several times in order to open this
meeting to the teams and to raise awareness, so hopefully more team
representatives will come to this meeting.

Fedora 29 Beta Go/No-Go meeting

Dear all,

The Go/No-Go meeting for the Fedora 29 Beta release will be held on
Thursday, 2018-09-13 at 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1. For more
information, see: <a href="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Go_No_Go_Meeting" title="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Go_No_Go_Meeting">https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Go_No_Go_Meeting</a>

View the meeting on Fedocal at
<a href="https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/Fedora%20release/2018/9/10/#m9338" title="https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/Fedora%20release/2018/9/10/#m9338">https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/Fedora%20release/2018/9/10/#m9338</a>

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2018-09-06 16:00 UTC)

  Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2018-09-06 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.

  Local time information (via.

Fedora Rawhide-20180904.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images.

Failed openQA tests: 31/132 (x86_64), 2/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)

New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180903.n.0):

ID: 274863 Test: x86_64 universal install_delete_pata
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/274863" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/274863">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/274863</a>
ID: 274919 Test: i386 universal install_ext3
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/274919" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/274919">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/274919</a>

Old failures (same test failed in Rawhide-20180903.n.0):

ID: 274765 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/274765" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/274765">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/274765</a>
ID: 274768 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://

Syndicate content