DevHeads.net

Fedora

golang packaging guidelines

Now that golang is packaged
(<a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=950281" title="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=950281">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=950281</a>), we might want to
have some packaging guidelines.

I have never done this, does anyone want to give it a try?

renich has started this but it is quite preliminary:
<a href="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Renich/Go_Packaging_Guidelines" title="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Renich/Go_Packaging_Guidelines">https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Renich/Go_Packaging_Guidelines</a>

Thanks,

Adam

Call for test php-fpm 5.5.0RC2 in F19

Hi,

I just build php 5.5.0RC2 in F19.

A quite interesting change was introduce in this version.

php-fpm now collaborate with systemd (work in type=notify) and will
report about its health via "systemctl status php-fpm" giving

- number of process (active + idle)
- number of request (total + slow)
- current traffic (req/sec since last refresh).

Ex: Status: "Processes active: 1, idle: 5, Requests: 765, slow: 2,
Traffic: 3.4req/sec"

Refresh interval is configurable using "systemd_interval" new option in
php-fpm.conf.

Arduino firmware permissible to include?

Arduino is an electronics prototyping board, and also a GNU GPL2-licenced IDE for writing and uploading code to such boards. Fedora has packages for the IDE.

Recent versions of the IDE include WiFi firmware for Arduino (<a href="http://arduino.cc/en/Main/ArduinoWiFiShield" title="http://arduino.cc/en/Main/ArduinoWiFiShield">http://arduino.cc/en/Main/ArduinoWiFiShield</a>). The Arduino "source" bundles include the binary firmware. Source code for the firmware is also included, but there are no build scripts, and the firmware is not built when the IDE itself is built.

Is it permissible to include this firmware in the Fedora packages?

F-19 Branched report: 20130523 changes

Compose started at Thu May 23 09:15:02 UTC 2013

Broken deps for x86_64

rawhide report: 20130523 changes

Compose started at Thu May 23 08:15:03 UTC 2013

Broken deps for x86_64

About volatile udev directory

Hi folks,

I've found the following in Fedora 18
[root@mpinode02 sergio]# LANG=C ls /run/udev/rules.d
ls: cannot access /run/udev/rules.d: No such file or directory

I haven't found anything in the changelog about a change about it, is there
no more that directory ?

Thanks in advance!

Abiword

While fixing sugar-write[1] I needed to update Abiword/libabiword to recent
versions[2]. I made this using a bunch of patches from SugarLabs, with
special interests in the gtk3 and instrospection ones.

I've made an experimental build[3] which looks promising but would like
others give it a try.

Thanks.

[1] <a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962238" title="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962238">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962238</a>
[2] <a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=605573" title="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=605573">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=605573</a>
[3] <a href="http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5411912" title="http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5411912">http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5411912</a>

Hardcoded TMPDIR - anywhere else?

Hello everyone!

I wonder whether any other application does a similar thing?
/usr/bin/firefox contains this nasty piece:

##
## Use $MOZ_TMPDIR if set.

Fedora 19 Beta Release Candidate 4 (RC4) Available Now!

not fit on a standard 700 MiB CD.

As per the Fedora 19 schedule [1], Fedora 19 Beta Release Candidate 4
(RC4) is now available for testing. Content information, including
changes, can be found at
<a href="https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5602#comment:19" title="https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5602#comment:19">https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5602#comment:19</a> . Please see the
following pages for download links (including delta ISOs) and testing
instructions. Normally dl.fedoraproject.org should provide the fastest
download, but download-ib01.fedoraproject.org is available as a mirror
(with an approximately 1 hour lag) in case of trouble.

Re: Software Management call for RFEs

Hi,

Please clean up the distaster package verification is.

rpm -Va is so incomplete it spawned rpmlint, package-cleanup and not doubt
others I forget about.

Even for the most basic checks its output is so useless and difficul to
parse we've seen a critical path package like gdm shipped with the wrong
file permissions without anyone noticing.

All those utilities need unification and the output format some serious
re-design so old and new packagers can be directed to a single tool that
does not need pages of explanations before its results can be exploited.

Regards,

MySQL Workbench searching for a new maintainer

Because of lack of interest in this package and lack of time to maintain
it correctly, I'm searching for a new maintainer.

Else, I plan to orphan:

- mysql-workbench
- mysql-connector-c++

Why ?
I will keep mysql-utilities and mysql-connector-python as this stuff
seems usefull and simple.

Remi.

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2013-05-23 16:00 UTC)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2013-05-23 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.

Local time information (via.

TBB rebased to 4.1u3 in Rawhide

This was long overdue, last update was almost a year ago. That said,
the update should be safe: upstream-tracker.org lists only one warning
that is potentially ABI-breaking, which is that the constant "eid_max"
changed value. That constant doesn't appear to be used by any of the
clients. Soname wasn't bumped.

If you encounter problems with TBB, please do not hesitate to contact me
(either via this e-mail address, or _petr on IRC) and I should be able
to help.

Thanks,
PM

Software Management call for RFEs

Dear Fedora community,
several months ago, at the Developer conference in Brno, Software Management
team received a whole bunch of proposals for new functionality in RPM and
related software stack.

We acknowledge the need for some changes in Software Management stack in
Fedora but we don't want to make changes just by guessing what our
users want.

F-19 Branched report: 20130522 changes

Compose started at Wed May 22 09:15:03 UTC 2013

Broken deps for x86_64

rawhide report: 20130522 changes

Compose started at Wed May 22 08:15:02 UTC 2013

Broken deps for x86_64

Anyone bought the CLover sunbook and made Fedora run on it.

I have dreamed for years of buying a laptop that I can actually use outside,
but I don't want to run Windows on it.

It is a little steep at 700 + 75 for ssd.

<a href="http://www.sunbook.us/?gclid=CPe1_ZPWqbcCFQdk7Aod9AMA0g" title="http://www.sunbook.us/?gclid=CPe1_ZPWqbcCFQdk7Aod9AMA0g">http://www.sunbook.us/?gclid=CPe1_ZPWqbcCFQdk7Aod9AMA0g</a>

Fedora 19 Beta Release Candidate 3 (RC3) Available Now!

not fit on a standard 700 MiB CD.

As per the Fedora 19 schedule [1], Fedora 19 Beta Release Candidate 3
(RC3) is now available for testing. Content information, including
changes, can be found at
<a href="https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5602#comment:16" title="https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5602#comment:16">https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5602#comment:16</a> . Please see the
following pages for download links (including delta ISOs) and testing
instructions. Normally dl.fedoraproject.org should provide the fastest
download, but download-ib01.fedoraproject.org is available as a mirror
(with an approximately 1 hour lag) in case of trouble.

2013-05-22 @ 16:00 UTC - F19 Beta Blocker Bug Review #8

# F19 Beta Blocker Review meeting #8
# Date: 2013-05-22
# Time: 16:00 UTC (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT)
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net

The eighth and hopefully final blocker review meeting for F19 beta will
be tomorrow. Come help us review blocker and FreezeException bugs!

We'll be running through the Beta blockers and freeze exception bugs.
The current list is available at:
<a href="http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current" title="http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current">http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current</a>

We'll be reviewing the bugs to determine ...

1. Whether they meet the Beta release criteria [1] and should stay
on the list
2.

Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2013-05-22)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.

To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
<a href="http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto" title="http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto">http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto</a>

or run:
date -d '2013-05-22 18:00 UTC'

Links to all tickets below can be found at:
<a href="https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9" title="https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9">https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9</a>

= Followups =

#topic #1098 F19 Features - Progress on Features 100% Complete
.fesco 1098
<a href="https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1098" title="https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1098">https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1098</a>

= New business =

#topic #1114 Would like to become a provenpackager
.fesco 1114
<a href="https://fedorahosted.org/f" title="https://fedorahosted.org/f">https://fedorahosted.org/f</a>

kbd using converted xkb layouts landing in Rawhide

Hello,

I have built kbd-1.15.5-6.fc20 recently.

%global _hardened_build 1 not working?

I got two bug reports sent to me because -fPIE was not used and the
packages contain suid binaries.

I'm working on fixing it and I added %global _hardened_build 1 to my spec
files but the output of %{optflags} does not seem to be modified as the
packaging guidelines[1] suggest they should.

What am I doing wrong?

Thanks,
Richard

[1] <a href="http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#PIE" title="http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#PIE">http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#PIE</a>

F-19 Branched report: 20130521 changes

Compose started at Tue May 21 09:15:02 UTC 2013

Broken deps for x86_64

Somewhat OT: About modules coresize

Hi,

I know that is somehat OT, but I was looking for trying to discover what
does mean the size column of lsmod. Some people says is memory used by the
module, but if I run strace lsmod I found that it takes a look to coresize
files at /sys and read
/usr/share/doc/kernel-doc-3.9.2/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-module and
it says "Module size in bytes" but if I see the filesize using ls don't
match

So what does really mean coresize?

TIA

rawhide report: 20130521 changes

Compose started at Tue May 21 08:15:02 UTC 2013

Broken deps for x86_64

Shall sockets are owned by rpm or created/removed by post/preun scriptlet?

Hello!

I'm currently work on packaging `courier-authlib` (needed for pkg'ing
and running courier MTA).

In maintainer's `generic-all-purpose-and-all-rpm-dists` spec-file there
is this scriptlet inside %install for creating/providing the needed
socket:

/scriptlet/

mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_localstatedir}/spool/authdaemon/
./authmksock %{buildroot}%{_localstatedir}/spool/authdaemon/socket
touch %{buildroot}%{_localstatedir}/spool/authdaemon/pid.lock
touch %{buildroot}%{_localstatedir}/spool/authdaemon/pid
chmod 0777 %{buildroot}%{_localstatedir}/spool/authdaemon/socket

/end

Rel-eng ticket: unblock mingw-openjpeg

Hi,
I've resurrected mingw-openjpeg and opened this rel-eng ticket [1] to
unblock it a while ago. Any chance anyone with the needed privileges can
quickly take care of it?

Thanks!

Sandro

[1] <a href="https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5611" title="https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5611">https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5611</a>

QA Testscase: Installation with mountpoint inside future $HOME?

Hello,

I've just hit a bug which causes $HOME to be owned by root if a
mountpoint is created inside $HOME during install, see [1]. I recall in
the past already occasionally hitting related problems, such as:
- /etc/skel/* not being copied to $HOME
- Files from /etc/skel/* being copied, but still being owned by root
inside $HOME

Might it be a good idea to create a QA testcase for such scenarios?

Review swaps

Hi

I have a few review requests that I would like to arrange swaps for:

3 packages related to particle physics simulation:

<a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877275" title="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877275">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877275</a>
Review Request: lhapdf - Les Houches Accord PDF Interface

<a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877396" title="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877396">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877396</a>
Review Request: HepMC - C++ Event Record for Monte Carlo Generators

<a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877607" title="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877607">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877607</a>
Review Request: pythia8 - Pythia Event Generator for High Energy Physics

2 Globus Toolkit packages (these are simple since they follow the
template used for all Globus toolkit packages):

http

F-19 Branched report: 20130520 changes

Compose started at Mon May 20 09:15:02 UTC 2013

Broken deps for x86_64

rawhide report: 20130520 changes

Compose started at Mon May 20 08:15:03 UTC 2013

Broken deps for x86_64

2013-05-20 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2013-05-20
# Time: 15:00 UTC
(<a href="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto" title="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto">https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto</a>)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net

Greetings testers!

It's meeting time again today/tomorrow! We'll check in on the status of
Beta, and test days. And then we'll move on to the blocker review
meeting that will follow immediately after.

This is a reminder of the upcoming QA meeting.

Orphaning gtkglextmm

Hi,

I'm going to orphan gtkglextmm. I took over maintainership because it
was a requirement of beldi, which is officially dead for a while now.

gtkglextmm itself FTBFS since Fedora 19 [1], but I think Debian has a
fix for this [2]. There also is a request for aarch64 support [3].

The only packages in rawhide that depend on gtkglextmm are python-visual
and repsnapper.

kickstart on LiveUSB creator?

Will be possible to add section to convert your LiveUSB from kickstart file
on Fedora live USB Creator tool?

Greetings!

F-19 Branched report: 20130519 changes

Compose started at Sun May 19 09:15:03 UTC 2013

Broken deps for x86_64

rawhide report: 20130519 changes

Compose started at Sun May 19 08:15:03 UTC 2013

Broken deps for x86_64

Gnome-shell-extension-weather woes

    Hi,

So I thought let's get a weather extension to see current weather in my city.
Should have been easy like slicing butter, right? It turned out to be crazy disaster!!.

0. I'm using GNOME Shell 3.4.1 on F17 (Beefy Miracle).

1. I do $ yum install gnome-shell-extension-weather.

2. It does not show up in the top panel. So I look around for some option to enable it.
    I try system settings, no luck. Nowhere do I see option for extensions.

3.

Branched wiki page

I just replaced the mess that was the Branched page on the wiki with a
new one based on the one I did for Rawhide a while back.

<a href="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/Branched" title="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/Branched">https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/Branched</a>

Please edit/improve/etc.

kevin

Review request: mingw-portmidi (and a lot more to come)

Hello all!  I'm trying to learn how to submit packages to Fedora...there's a lot to read!  But I build packages locally all the time, and it seems like a shame that they don't go any further than that.  So I'm trying to take it to the next level.  (I'm already loving <a href="http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/" title="http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/">http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/</a> -- how awesome is it that I can test builds on versions of Fedora Core I don't have installed?)

My first task is to submit all the dependencies that it takes to build Mixxx (an open-source DJing program, see <a href="http://www.mixxx.org/" title="http://www.mixxx.org/">http://www.mixxx.org/</a> for more info) under MinGW.  (I'm also currently trying to get t

F-19 Branched report: 20130518 changes

Compose started at Sat May 18 09:15:02 UTC 2013

Broken deps for x86_64

rawhide report: 20130518 changes

Compose started at Sat May 18 08:15:03 UTC 2013

Broken deps for x86_64

Does -devel package name only indicate "C" development packages?

<a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962081" title="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962081">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962081</a>

I have a request to change the name of selinux-policy-devel to
selinux-policy-devel-support, since

"everywhere else in the distro -devel means just header files in c and not any
other development tools and we have several scripts that assume that's the case."

selinux-policy-devel contains interface files and tools required to build
selinux-policy.

anaconda / initial-setup / gnome-initial-setup: can we do this better?

So I'm writing a blog post on this topic ATM, and that really kinda
brought home how messy this design is at present.

Quick refresher for anyone who hasn't looked at it much yet: in F19,
anaconda can create user accounts, and 'firstboot' has been replaced
with two alternative tools, 'initial-setup' which is used in any
graphical install other than a GNOME install and just replicates
anaconda's 'root password', 'user creation' and 'date/time' spokes, and
gnome-initial-setup, which is used in GNOME installs and is its own
whole thing that can also do user creation.

I mapped out all the potenti

Unpacking SRPMs

I'd like some scriptable way to unpack SRPMs up and including to the
%prep stage. Ideally, the results would end up in a directory I
specify, and intermediate directories which only contain a single
subdirectory are skipped. (The eventual goal is to run two such
directory tress through diff -uraN, and I want to avoid spurious
differences due to an update from foo-1.2 to foo-1.3.)

I've already learned the hard way that I need to use something like mock
because some %prep script assume that build requires are installed.

F-19 Branched report: 20130517 changes

Compose started at Fri May 17 09:15:02 UTC 2013

Broken deps for x86_64

rawhide report: 20130517 changes

Compose started at Fri May 17 08:15:02 UTC 2013

Broken deps for x86_64

Soname bump libpng (rawhide) - new libraries libpng.16.so and libpng16.so.16.2.0

Hi folks,

in order that BZ (<a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963113" title="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963113">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963113</a>)
libpng library was bumped.

koji build: <a href="http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5391511" title="http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5391511">http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5391511</a>

$> rpm -qpl
/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/libpng-devel-1.6.2-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm

/usr/bin/libpng-config
/usr/bin/libpng16-config
/usr/include/libpng16
/usr/include/libpng16/png.h
/usr/include/libpng16/pngconf.h
/usr/include/libpng16/pnglibconf.h
/usr/include/png.h
/usr/include/pngconf.h
/usr/include/pnglibconf.h
/usr/lib64/libpng.so
/usr/lib64/libpng16.so
/usr/lib64/pkgconfig/libpng.pc
/usr/lib64/pkgco

Heads-up: changes to soname dependency generation in rawhide

Hey all,

Starting today, as soon as rpm-4.11.0.1-5 hits the rawhide buildroots,
rpmbuild will filter out "non-library" ELF soname dependencies by
default. The soname dependencies are filtered by name: only soname
dependencies containing ".so" and starting with "lib" or "ld" will be
recorded into requires/provides.

The immediate practical benefit is that most of those gazillion unwanted
provides from dlopen'ed plugins and the like will be gone when packages
are rebuilt, without having to manually filter them out in specs.

Fedora 19 Beta Release Candidate 2 (RC2) Available Now!

not fit on a standard 700 MiB CD.

As per the Fedora 19 schedule [1], Fedora 19 Beta Release Candidate 2
(RC2) is now available for testing. Content information, including
changes, can be found at
<a href="https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5602#comment:14" title="https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5602#comment:14">https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5602#comment:14</a> . Please see the
following pages for download links (including delta ISOs) and testing
instructions. Normally dl.fedoraproject.org should provide the fastest
download, but download-ib01.fedoraproject.org is available as a mirror
(with an approximately 1 hour lag) in case of trouble.

su starts behaving oddly sometimes on F19

This is a weird bug I've seen 3 or 4 times since upgrading to F19, and
am having trouble pinning down.

Occasionally, after my session has been up for some time, runs of 'su'
start behaving oddly. After I enter the root password, it takes a long
time - longer than the delay that's always happened when you fat-finger
your password, even - before it succeeds. Usually, of course, it's
instant.

Stuck koji job?

Is there some way I can find out what is going on with this job?

<a href="http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5389211" title="http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5389211">http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5389211</a>

The Rawhide version built in about half an hour, but this build (for
F-19) has been on the creating SRPM step pretty much all day. Thanks,

funny 'systemd-analize time' issue

Hi, i just tried to compare my F17 system with F19 pre-release and found
something odd in my F17 system:

# uptime
19:08:26 up 2 days, 10 min, 5 users, load average: 0.18, 0.28, 0.31

# systemd-analyze time
Bootup is not yet finished. Please try again later.

A very funny message.

F18 systemd update broke varnish service?

Hi,

I noticed that varnish service doesn't work after systemd update to version
201-2

varnish.service - Varnish a high-perfomance HTTP accelerator
Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/varnish.service; enabled)
Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since czw 2013-05-16 23:12:50 CEST;
1min 2s ago
Process: 424 ExecStart=/usr/sbin/varnishd -P /var/run/varnish.pid -f
$VARNISH_VCL_CONF -a ${VARNISH_LISTEN_ADDRESS}:${VARNISH_LISTEN_PORT} -T
${VARNISH_ADMIN_LISTEN_ADDRESS}:${VARNISH_ADMIN_LISTEN_PORT} -t
$VARNISH_TTL -w
${VARNISH_MIN_THREADS},${VARNISH_MAX_THREADS},${VARNISH_THREAD_TIMEOUT}

Avahi - glibc - nsswitch.conf - mdns4

The GNU C Library update brake host name resolution via Multicast DNS[1].
This has long been present[2], so am I missing something in this respect?

# grep ^hosts /etc/nsswitch.conf
hosts: files mdns4_minimal [NOTFOUND=return] dns mdns4

# rpm -qf /etc/nsswitch.conf
glibc-2.16-31.fc18.x86_64

# rpm -Uv glibc-*2.16-32.fc18.x86_64.rpm
Preparing packages...
glibc-common-2.16-32.fc18.x86_64
glibc-2.16-32.fc18.x86_64
glibc-headers-2.16-32.fc18.x86_64
glibc-devel-2.16-32.fc18.x86_64
glibc-static-2.16-32.fc18.x86_64
glibc-utils-2.16-32.fc18.x86_64
glibc-static-2.16-31.fc18.x86_64
glibc-devel-2.1

Systemd tip: service conditionals

In relation to the 'when startup delays become bugs' thread, it occurs
to me that perhaps not all packagers / devs know about one of the neater
systemd capabilities: conditional service activation. You can make
activation of your service conditional on a wide range of things,
including:

1. The existence of a path or file
2. The fact that a file or directory actually contains something
3. The fact that a file is executable
4. The presence of a given parameter (or value of a parameter) on the
kernel cmdline
5. Whether the system is a VM (and what virtualization software it's
using)
6.

Unresponsive maintainer: Steven M. Parrish

Hi

He doesn't seem to have been responding to bugs for years. I have
initiated the unresponsive maintainer process

<a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963890" title="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963890">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963890</a>

Rahul

F-19 Branched report: 20130516 changes

Compose started at Thu May 16 09:15:02 UTC 2013

Broken deps for x86_64

rawhide report: 20130516 changes

Compose started at Thu May 16 08:15:03 UTC 2013

Broken deps for x86_64

Update libical to 1.0 in rawhide the next week (soname version bump)

Hello,
there was a release of libical 1.0 recently [1], and I'd like to update
rawhide with it. It seems to be API compatible with 0.48, they only
bumped the soname version due to version jump to 1.0.

sear and sear-media being retired

I am going to retire sear and sear-media as sear isn't being actively
maintained upstream and ember is the primary worldforge client.

Because of the beta freeze, I won't be doing the actual retirement for
about a week (hopefully). I have already done ember and ember-media
builds that obsolete sear and sear-media, respectively.

Syndicate content