Hello,

I noticed a case where the `dnf provides` output is inconsistent.

Missing expected images:

Atomichost raw-xz x86_64
Atomichost qcow2 x86_64

Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
3 of 47 required tests failed, 3 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below

Failed openQA tests: 9/146 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)

ID: 407842 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_default **GATING**
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/407842" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/407842">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/407842</a>
ID: 407854 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/407854" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/407854">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/407854</a>
ID: 407883 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default@uefi **GATING**

In a few days, I intend to update coq to version 8.9.1 in Rawhide, and
also update all of the packages that depend on it. The why package
has been abandoned by upstream. Its latest version does not work with
the latest versions of its dependent packages (why3 and frama-c), and
upstream has no intention of fixing it. I intend to retire it when I
do the updates. If somebody wants it, let me know, but be aware that
you will effectively have to become upstream.

Hi guys

I'm trying to enable gating tests for package system-storage-manager.
The tarball contains upstream tests and I would like to use these
(with the ability to apply patches to them, same as to the rest of the
code).

Since I was looking at a copy of the F30 repo for amd64, here's a list
of a bunch of packages whose dist tag suggests they haven't rebuilt
successfully in any currently-supported Fedora release.

Hi,

Bug 1711303 - Review Request: pass-pwned - Password-Store extension
for Have I Been Pwned
<a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1711303" title="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1711303">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1711303</a>

is stuck. It got an awesome first pass on 19 May, but has received no
updates since then and has no assignee.

Can someone take a look?

thanks,

bex

Hello,

Would anyone know how to contact Filip? There are a few pending bugs
that they've not replied to yet[1].

Hi everyone,

I have a bunch of packages in a local repo built for various versions
of Fedora and CentOS, and am looking to build some of them for EL-8.
Clearly the way to go for an EL-8 add-on repo is to build modules, so
that it what I'd like to do. However, I want to do it on my own
infrastructure and hence use the lower-level tooling such as
mbs-manager/mock and local git repos rather than fedpkg/koji/dist-git.

There's quite a bit of documentation around about building modules but
what I've found seems to be either out of date (e.g.

Missing expected images:

Atomichost raw-xz x86_64
Atomichost qcow2 x86_64

Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
1 of 47 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below

Failed openQA tests: 8/137 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)

ID: 407317 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/407317" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/407317">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/407317</a>
ID: 407346 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_no_user **GATING**
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/407346" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/407346">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/407346</a>
ID: 407352 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_update_graphical
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject">https://openqa.fedoraproject</a>.

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 31 Rawhide 20190529.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time.

Can someone explain why the destop environment (here Cinnamon) can have
such an impact on the graphic card performance ?

Using glmark, we see a 2x to 20x factor in glmark performance between
various destops (mate,xlfce,cinnamon). What can justify such a huge gap
in perfs ?

Even better is there a way to investigate the GPU usage (a la ps or top)
to understand such issues ?

Thank's in advance..

Theo.

A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update:

Version: 29.20190528.0
Commit(x86_64): cb50ac29d58f4e7e8dcfc3c2dd4156c6acd17038577437e4744edee7b7c02eda
Commit(aarch64): a07e18d150100f136bf4170107174cc7f5349a89106c458eaa2283613164b834
Commit(ppc64le): 261ea0cc3cdb6437295d78b031974d794fff38e12728cc8bb0c94be2f5e1b34c

We are releasing images from multiple architectures but please note
that x86_64 architecture is the only one that undergoes automated
testing at this time.

Existing systems can be upgraded in place via e.g.

Hello,

I'd like to propose tiny correction for the Fedora wiki page about GRUB2 [1].

However I'm not confident enought to edit it prior to any discussions,
so that's why I'm writing here.

In the chapter "Updating GRUB 2 configuration on UEFI systems"
In the section "Install the bootloader files"
I believe, there should be an information added, that the 'grub2-efi'
package *must* match your architecture. So e.g.

As of the 28th of May 2019, Fedora 28 has reached its end of life
for updates and support. No further updates, including security
updates, will be available for Fedora 28. Fedora 29 will continue to receive
updates until approximately one month after the release of Fedora 31.
The maintenance schedule of Fedora releases is documented on the
Fedora Project wiki [0].

Hello, I have tried to install Fedora 28, 29, and 30 on my HP Omen with nVidia Graphics. Fedora 28 and 29 had issues with the Keyboard, Fedora 30 tested just fine from the USB drive however after installing it, the system would not go past the login screen. No functions on the keyboard or mouse worked either.

I loved Fedora 26 and would love to use Fedora 30 over Windows 10. Is there a patch that needs installed while using the trial USB drive? Any thoughts or driver programs that I need to install with it?

<a href="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Nodejs12x" title="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Nodejs12x">https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Nodejs12x</a>

== Summary ==
The latest release of Node.js to carry a 30-month lifecycle is the
12.x series. As with 10.x and 8.x before it, Fedora 31 will carry 12.x
as the default Node.js interpreter for the system.

Hello,

My name is Gordon Messmer.  I've been a long-time user of Red Hat
systems, starting with Red Hat Linux 4.2 in 1997.  I've been packaging
software in rpm format for use in business environments for very nearly
as long.  I've also been a semi-active member of the Red Hat and Fedora
mailing lists most of those years.

My first contribution will be ansible-bender: a tool that builds
container images using ansible playbooks.

<a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1714377" title="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1714377">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1714377</a>

Dear all,

You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Modularity Team (weekly) on 2019-05-28 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC
At <a href="mailto:fedora-meeting- ... at irc dot freenode.net">fedora-meeting- ... at irc dot freenode.net</a>

The meeting will be about:
Meeting of the Modularity Team.

More information available at: [Modularity Team Docs](<a href="https://docs.pagure.org/modularity/" title="https://docs.pagure.org/modularity/">https://docs.pagure.org/modularity/</a>)

The agenda for the meeting is available as flagged tickets [in the Modularity repository](<a href="https://pagure.io/modularity/issues?status=Open&amp;tags=Meeting" title="https://pagure.io/modularity/issues?status=Open&amp;tags=Meeting">https://pagure.io/modularity/issues?status=Open&amp;tags=Meeting</a>).

Source: <a href="https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/9480/" title="https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/9480/">https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/9480/</a>

Missing expected images:

Atomichost raw-xz x86_64
Atomichost qcow2 x86_64

Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed

Failed openQA tests: 15/137 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)

ID: 406384 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_master
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/406384" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/406384">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/406384</a>
ID: 406385 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_replica
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/406385" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/406385">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/406385</a>
ID: 406386 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_client
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/406386" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/406386">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/406386</a>
ID: 406392 Test: x86_64 Serve

Hi everyone,

After spending quite a bit of time fixing VXL to build, I've now run
into errors with it building on 32 bit arches.

Unfortunately, I don't foresee myself having enough cycles in the near
future to debug the C++ bits to see what's happening here, and while I
have filed a ticket upstream, they seem to be even busier than us (all
issues seem to get a "A PR would be welcome" response)

<a href="https://github.com/vxl/vxl/issues/638" title="https://github.com/vxl/vxl/issues/638">https://github.com/vxl/vxl/issues/638</a>

Any chance any C++ ninjas here would have some time to look into this
please? A PR fixing the issue upstream would be absolutely fantastic.

Hey,

I was told that Frédéric Lepied (flepied) has left Red Hat.

His FAS account however only has a @redhat.com e-mail address.

Any idea how to reach him? We'd like to have one of his two packages retired:

<a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1711724" title="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1711724">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1711724</a>

Thanks,

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
<a href="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life" title="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life">https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life</a>

Note: If you received this mail directly you (co)maintain one of the affected
packages or a package that depends on one.

It seems a new texlive-base build:

<a href="https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1270690" title="https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1270690">https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1270690</a>

was done by spot yesterday. This bumped the soname of libsynctex in
texlive-lib from libsynctex.so.1 to libsynctex.so.2. This broke
evince's dependencies, which caused the Workstation live to stop
building, which broke the last Rawhide compose:

<a href="https://pagure.io/dusty/failed-composes/issue/1915" title="https://pagure.io/dusty/failed-composes/issue/1915">https://pagure.io/dusty/failed-composes/issue/1915</a>

Please remember to announce soname bumps ahead of time so this kind of
problem can be avoided. Thanks.

I am rebuilding evince at present.

Hi,

I try to contact Edouard Bourguignon (FAS: madko) in order to get
glances updated but no response was received since two weeks.

<a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1708883" title="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1708883">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1708883</a>

Is anybody knows how to contact him by other way ?

fedora_active_user:

Last login in FAS:
madko 2018-10-28
Last action on koji:
Fri, 11 Aug 2017 package list entry created: darktable in f26 by pkgdb
Last package update on bodhi:
2018-10-16 18:52:18 on package glances-3.0.2-1.fc29
Last actions performed according to fedmsg:
- <a href="mailto:didier. ... at gmail dot com">didier. ... at gmail dot com</a> updated nothing on RHBZ#1708883 'Update
gla

<a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1713767" title="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1713767">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1713767</a>

libnbd is a library we're planning to use in a few places where we
need a client library to access NBD servers. It's a small C library
that also builds Python bindings as a subpackage.

Will take a review in exchange for something of similar complexity.

Rich.

<a href="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPM-4.15" title="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPM-4.15">https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPM-4.15</a>

== Summary ==
Update RPM to the 4.15.0 release.

== Owner ==
* Name: User:pmatilai, User:ffesti
* Email: ... at redhat dot com, ... at redhat dot com

== Detailed Description ==

RPM 4.15 contains numerous improvements over previous versions
* Faster builds due to increased parallelism
* Dynamic build dependency generator (planned)
* Caret version operator (the opposite of tilde)
* String data is returned as surrogate-escaped utf-8 in Python 3 bindings
* %patchlist and %sourcelist spec sections for minimal boilerplate
patch and source declarations
* Ex

perl-SQL-Shell since 1.16 version has GPLv2+ license instead of GPLv2.

-- Petr

Missing expected images:

Atomichost raw-xz x86_64
Atomichost qcow2 x86_64

Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64)