DevHeads.net

Development

Fedora 29-20181012.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images.

Failed openQA tests: 11/133 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)

ID: 294742 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/294742" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/294742">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/294742</a>
ID: 294756 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_master
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/294756" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/294756">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/294756</a>
ID: 294759 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/294759" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/294759">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/294759</a>
ID: 294768 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/294768" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/294768">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/294768</a>
ID: 294779 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-

Fedora 30: Deprecating /etc/sysconf/nfs

Hello,

A few years back there was a movement the NFS community
to consulate all nfs configuration into one file
call /etc/nfs.conf... See nfs.conf(5)

Maybe stupidly, I've maintain backwards compatibility
for that last couple Fedora releases. I think it is
time to go to the single file configuration, since
the development on Fedora 29 is winding down and
it's winding up for Fedora 30.

On fresh rawhide installs /etc/sysconfig/nfs will still
be installed but with direction to use /etc/nfs.conf

If /etc/sysconfig/nfs does exists the configuration will
*not* be overridden...

Fedora 29 Final Go/No-Go meeting

Dear all,

The Go/No-Go meeting for the Fedora 29 Final release will be held on
Thursday, 2018-10-18 at 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1. For more
information, see: <a href="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Go_No_Go_Meeting" title="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Go_No_Go_Meeting">https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Go_No_Go_Meeting</a>

View the meeting on Fedocal at
<a href="https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/Fedora%20release/2018/10/18/#m9379" title="https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/Fedora%20release/2018/10/18/#m9379">https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/Fedora%20release/2018/10/18/#m9379</a>

Self Introduction: Casper Meijn

Hi, my name is Casper.
I am a software developer by trade and in my free time I am developing
an open-source application [1].
During the development I noticed that the library I use (KDSoap) is not
available in Fedora.

updates not pushed stable prior to f29 freeze

I've 2 bodhi updates that were submitted for batched/stable prior to the
freeze, will these get pushed prior to release?

Installation image layout

Hi all!

I'm new on this list. I work on Qubes OS, where Fedora is used as a base
distribution.

While trying to build the installation image in reproducible manner[1],
I found the current installation image have unusual layout.

Fedora 29-20181011.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images.

Failed openQA tests: 11/133 (x86_64), 3/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)

ID: 293844 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/293844" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/293844">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/293844</a>
ID: 293858 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_master
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/293858" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/293858">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/293858</a>
ID: 293861 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/293861" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/293861">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/293861</a>
ID: 293865 Test: i386 Server-boot-iso install_default
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/293865" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/293865">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/293865</a>
ID: 293869 Test: i386 Everything-boot-iso inst

Fedora 29 Beta - Cannot add printer

Hi,

Using default Gnome shell on Wayland I cannot add a printer.

In Gnome settings, after pressing "unlock" and "add" button and than
selecting a driver, a pop up message "Failed to add new printer"
There are no messages in system journal.

PS: I've SELinux in permissive mode just in case.

Fedora 29 Branched 20181011.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 29 Branched 20181011.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time.

Fedora 29-20181010.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images.

Failed openQA tests: 11/133 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)

ID: 293272 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/293272" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/293272">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/293272</a>
ID: 293277 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/293277" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/293277">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/293277</a>
ID: 293291 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_master
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/293291" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/293291">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/293291</a>
ID: 293294 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/293294" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/293294">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/293294</a>
ID: 293303 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop

Self Introduction: Henrik Böving

Hi, my name is Henrik Böving, I go by the name "hargonix" on bugzilla and
in the fedora bug tracker.
I grabbed the issue for RPM packaging on the getmac project on GitHub:
<a href="https://github.com/GhostofGoes/getmac" title="https://github.com/GhostofGoes/getmac">https://github.com/GhostofGoes/getmac</a> as a part of Hacktober and would now
like to add the package I created to Fedora. The review request for the
package can be found here:
<a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1638431" title="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1638431">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1638431</a>. As I have never been
part of any open source project as big as Fedora, I am looking forward to
see how things work in such a big project.

Moving on from Council Engineering role

Hello Fedora Friends,

I believe it's time for me to move on from my current role as the
Council Engineering representative. When I resigned from FESCo a bit
ago, I thought I could still fulfill this role. Unfortunately, that
turns out to not be the case. I cannot in good conscience hold a seat
on the Council and be an absentee member.

As we look to the future for Fedora, we need someone with more active
participation to be present.

Intent to drop python2-SecretStorage and python2-keyring in a week

Hi.

We are planning to update python-SecretStorage to a version that does
not support python2 [0][1].

Whoever needs python2-SecretStorage can add it as a separate package,
the spec is ready at [2].

Nobody from the current maintainers of dependent packages responded to a
request of maintainership (some said they don't need it).

python2-SecretStorage is needed by python-keyring and transitively for:

* supernova
* python-keystoneclient
* python-msrestazure
* python-oauth2client

I decided I won't package python2-SecretStorage just to orphan it
immediately.

Build flatpak package with fedpkg

Hi,

There is a new rpkg release, which has a new command flatpak-build for
building flatpak package.

Updates:
<a href="https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/rpkg-1.56-2.fc29" title="https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/rpkg-1.56-2.fc29">https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/rpkg-1.56-2.fc29</a>
<a href="https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/rpkg-1.56-2.fc28" title="https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/rpkg-1.56-2.fc28">https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/rpkg-1.56-2.fc28</a>

Happy packaging!

PHP version 7.3.0RC3 built in rawhide

Hi,

<a href="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/php73" title="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/php73">https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/php73</a>

php-7.3.0~rc3-1 is built in rawhide.

I will start to rebuild all dependent packages (~60)

Please take care of yours (else I will do it later)

Cheers,
Remi

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2018-10-11 16:00 UTC)

  Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2018-10-11 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.

  Local time information (via.

Fedora 29 compose report: 20181010.n.0 changes

===== SUMMARY =====
Added images: 0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages: 0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages: 0 B
Size of upgraded packages: 0 B
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages: 0 B
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

===== ADDED IMAGES =====

===== DROPPED IMAGES =====

===== ADDED PACKAGES =====

===== DROPPED PACKAGES =====

===== UPGRADED PACKAGES =====

===== DOWNGRADED PACKAGES =====

package downgrades from f28 to f29

Hi all,

I tried upgrading my system to f29, and I noticed some packages that
would have been downgraded.

Default rpm macro packaging layout and conventions

Hi,

I'd like Fedora and FPC in general to agree to a general layout for
macros and their associated material like templates, so the next step
can focus on the actual macros and their documentation, and not on how
the result is shipped to users.

<a href="https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/813" title="https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/813">https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/813</a>

The reason being I'm currently wrapping up three sets of rpm macros for
Fedora⁰.

Fedora 29-20181009.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images.

Failed openQA tests: 13/133 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)

ID: 291421 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/291421" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/291421">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/291421</a>
ID: 291429 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_services_start
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/291429" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/291429">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/291429</a>
ID: 291435 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_master
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/291435" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/291435">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/291435</a>
ID: 291438 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/291438" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/291438">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/291438</a>
ID: 291447 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_n

PSA: Please check that your Python 2 package doesn't have dependent packages before dropping it

Greetings!

I've been bitten twice in the past week by dependencies of my packages
dropping the Python 2 RPMs, presumably due to the Fedora 30 change[0].

Note that the change does state that the package should not be dropped
if other packages depend on them.

On that note, I do know how to check if other packages Require my
package:

$ dnf repoquery --whatrequires <something_my_package_provides>

How do I check if other packages BuildRequire my package?

Fedora Rawhide-20181009.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images:

Atomichost qcow2 x86_64
Atomichost raw-xz x86_64

Failed openQA tests: 13/133 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)

New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20181006.n.0):

ID: 291273 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_browser
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/291273" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/291273">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/291273</a>
ID: 291292 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso base_services_start
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/291292" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/291292">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/291292</a>
ID: 291330 Test: x86_64 universal install_cyrillic_language
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/291330" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/291330">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/291330</a>
ID: 291331 Test: x86_64 universal install_arabic_language
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fe" title="https://openqa.fe">https://openqa.fe</a>

ghc module and Haskell static linked executables

Hi,

A heads-up that I am planning to move Haskell executables to static linking
in F30.
This to improve the experience with the new ghc module: currently most of
the Haskell executables (except hscolour and hedgewars I believe) are
dynamically linked which conflicts
with modular ghc, making it painful to use.

Switching to Haskell static linking means that cabal-install, pandoc,
ShellCheck, git-annex, etc will continue to work even if one installs a ghc
module.

<a href="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Haskell" title="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Haskell">https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Haskell</a> is to be updated to
reflect this.

Jens

Fedora 29-20181008.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images.

Failed openQA tests: 10/133 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)

ID: 290770 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/290770" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/290770">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/290770</a>
ID: 290779 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/290779" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/290779">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/290779</a>
ID: 290790 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/290790" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/290790">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/290790</a>
ID: 290807 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso base_services_start
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/290807" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/290807">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/290807</a>
ID: 290808 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notificat

Fedora 29 Final Freeze

Hi all,

Today, October 09th 2018, is an important day on the Fedora 29
schedule [1], with significant cut-offs.

Today we have the Final Freeze [2]. This means that only packages
which fix accepted blocker or freeze exception bugs [3][4][5] will be
marked as 'stable' and included in the Final composes.

Fedora 29 Branched 20181008.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 29 Branched 20181008.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time.

Reminder meeting : Modularity Office Hours

Dear all,

You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Modularity Office Hours on 2018-10-09 from 10:00:00 to 11:00:00 US/Eastern
At <a href="mailto:fedora- ... at chat dot freenode.net">fedora- ... at chat dot freenode.net</a>

The meeting will be about:
This is where you ask the Fedora Modularity Team questions (and we try to answer them)!

Join us on [IRC](irc://chat.freenode.net/#fedora-modularity): #fedora-modularity on [FreeNode](<a href="https://freenode.net" title="https://freenode.net">https://freenode.net</a>)

Source: <a href="https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/5910/" title="https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/5910/">https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/5910/</a>

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2018-10-08)

=====================================
#fedora-meeting-1: FESCO (2018-10-08)
=====================================

Meeting started by jforbes at 15:00:03 UTC.

taking over some of fale's packages

Hi,

As fale has orphaned packages (
<a href="https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ ... at lists dot fedoraproject.org/thread/TTRKFTADCEHAJSZ55YXIPT3DOZY5RTYW/" title="https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ ... at lists dot fedoraproject.org/thread/TTRKFTADCEHAJSZ55YXIPT3DOZY5RTYW/">https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ ... at lists dot fedoraproject....</a>
) I would like to take over rubygem-asciidoctor-pdf and some of its
dependencies.

I've opened <a href="https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7855" title="https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7855">https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7855</a>

Please let me know if there are objections.

Regards,
François

Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 28.20181007.0

A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update:

Version: 28.20181007.0
Commit(x86_64): 8df48fa2e70ad1952153ae00edbba08ed18b53c3d4095a22985d1085f5203ac6
Commit(aarch64): 6b8d55e59750cfe8e490dbfa63ab12ccdb0a231a4d58e1b074793dddb6c49648
Commit(ppc64le): 4a95f167ee4063556daf59e13b85f7d84fb1073db4150c8f3dd6a4a36c80523f

We are releasing images from multiple architectures but please note
that x86_64 architecture is the only one that undergoes automated
testing at this time.

Existing systems can be upgraded in place via e.g.

Schedule for Monday's FESCo Meeting (2018-10-08)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Monday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.

To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
<a href="http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto" title="http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto">http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto</a>

or run:
date -d '2018-10-08 15:00 UTC'

Links to all issues to be discussed can be found at:
<a href="https://pagure.io/fesco/report/meeting_agenda" title="https://pagure.io/fesco/report/meeting_agenda">https://pagure.io/fesco/report/meeting_agenda</a>

= Followups =

#topic #1974 Problematic blocker for F29: dnf 'offline' module tracking
.fesco 1974
<a href="https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1974" title="https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1974">https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1974</a>

= Open Floor =

For more complete details, please visit each individual
issue.

Fedora Rawhide-20181006.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images.

Failed openQA tests: 9/133 (x86_64), 1/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)

New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20181005.n.0):

ID: 290296 Test: i386 Server-dvd-iso install_default
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/290296" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/290296">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/290296</a>
ID: 290351 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/290351" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/290351">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/290351</a>

Old failures (same test failed in Rawhide-20181005.n.0):

ID: 290274 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/290274" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/290274">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/290274</a>
ID: 290288 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso

Yet another gargantuan mathematical software update

Hi folks,

It's about time for another "update the world" moment for some of the
mathematical software we have in Fedora. I'm going to try to clear
away a big chunk of my backlogged package work with this update, so it
will be even bigger than usual. Primary goals are to switch from
atlas or the reference blas to openblas, and to drop python 2
packages.

I plan to do all of the necessary rebuilds myself. Package
maintainers, if you would rather that I did not rebuild your package
for you, please let me know. Otherwise, I will do all of these builds
in approximately 1 week from today.

2018-10-08 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora 29 Blocker Review Meeting

# F29 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2018-10-08
# Time: 16:00 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net

Hi folks! We have 6 proposed Final blockers and 4 proposed Final freeze
exceptions to review, so let's have a review meeting on Monday.

Self Introduction: John Ford

Hi,

My name is John Ford and I'm looking to get back into working on Fedora. I
have been a Fedora user since Version 8, though I've been using Red Hat
since I found an out of date boxed copy of Red Hat Linux 5.2 at a book
store.

I've been involved in Fedora in the past, but it was a very long time ago.
I was part of the packager group back then. I used the FAS account
"john64", but I've created a new FAS account "jhford". The old nick was a
terrible choice I made when I was much younger. I hadn't had the time to
keep up with packaging, but I'd like to get more involved again.

Fedora Rawhide-20181005.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images.

Failed openQA tests: 18/133 (x86_64), 3/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)

New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180930.n.0):

ID: 289323 Test: i386 Server-boot-iso install_default
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/289323" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/289323">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/289323</a>
ID: 289357 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/289357" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/289357">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/289357</a>
ID: 289393 Test: x86_64 universal install_european_language
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/289393" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/289393">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/289393</a>
ID: 289395 Test: x86_64 universal install_arabic_language
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/28939" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/28939">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/28939</a>

Fedora 29-20181005.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images.

Failed openQA tests: 10/133 (x86_64), 1/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)

ID: 290006 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/290006" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/290006">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/290006</a>
ID: 290012 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/290012" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/290012">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/290012</a>
ID: 290015 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/290015" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/290015">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/290015</a>
ID: 290016 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/290016" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/290016">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/290016</a>
ID: 290028 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso inst

Fedora 29 Branched 20181005.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 29 Branched 20181005.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time.

Recent openQA test failures

Hey folks!

If anyone's looking at openQA results for their updates, you may have
noticed odd failures for several tests for updates submitted in the
last day or so.

It seems that all runs of tests that communicate with each other have
been failing on production openQA since the infra reboot that happened
recently, because a key openQA service did not come up properly when
the server was rebooted. All these failures are spurious and can be
safely ignored.

many legit devel@ emails marked as spam by gmail (dmarc reject)

Semi-related to the "Attention Gmail users, please turn off HTML"
thread; anyone *not* using gmail (e.g. all Yahoo email users) are
having their emails put into spam by google mail.

raise fileno limit to make Steam Proton / Wine+esync work well in Fedora

(cross-posting to devel and desktop lists, ideally reply to both)

Hello,

this is a request for feedback regarding adjusting process limits to make
Steam/Wine work better on Fedora.

*A quick background:*
In August Valve announced [1] Proton [2], their own fork of Wine, to get
included in their Steam Play functionality, and allowing Linux players to
run Windows-only games transparently from Steam without any complex
configuration, just with a press of a button. Not everything works of
course, but the success rate is more than decent [3].

Fedora Modularity Classroom for packagers next Tuesday

Hey all,

I'll be hosting a Fedora Modularity Classroom targeted at packagers who
want to build multiple versions of software on independent lifecycles for
Fedora.

When: Tuesday, October 09 at 1400 UTC
How: Bluejeans <a href="https://bluejeans.com/6638527489" title="https://bluejeans.com/6638527489">https://bluejeans.com/6638527489</a> (or simply dial MODULARITY)

More details:
<a href="https://fedoramagazine.org/fedora-classroom-session-fedora-modularity-101/" title="https://fedoramagazine.org/fedora-classroom-session-fedora-modularity-101/">https://fedoramagazine.org/fedora-classroom-session-fedora-modularity-101/</a>

Recording will be available on YouTube.

Cheers!
Adam

Problem with mock --forcearch=s390x

I am trying to determine why the latest version of bigloo segfaults on
s390x during the build. I launched a mock build with mock -r
fedora-rawhide-s390x --forcearch=s390x --rebuild
bigloo-4.3c-1.fc30.src.rpm, then went away for several hours.

Attempting to contact unresponsive maintainers:

Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses for these package
maintainers are no longer valid. I'm starting the unresponsive
maintainer policy to find out if they are still interested in
maintaining their packages (and if so, have them update their email
addresses in FAS).

If they're not interested in maintaining or we can't locate them in 1
week, I'll have FESCo orphan the packages so that others can take them
over.

If you have a way to contact these maintainers, please let them know
that we'd appreciate knowing what to do with their packages.

Fedora testing-20181004.0 compose check report

No missing expected images.

Failed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64)

ID: 288682 Test: x86_64 AtomicHost-dvd_ostree-iso install_default
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/288682" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/288682">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/288682</a>
ID: 288683 Test: x86_64 AtomicHost-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/288683" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/288683">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/288683</a>

Requesting updated contact info for Matthias Runge (mrunge)

Hey all,

I've been trying to get in touch with Matthias Runge (mrunge) over the
last couple of days (for getting python-celery into EPEL7 for Pagure
5). However, his email address listed in FAS bounces with "unable to
connect" errors.

Does anyone know of another email address or method to get in touch with him?

Thanks in advance!

libgps soname bump

There is a new release of gpsd, which breaks the ABI and API of
libgps. If there are no objections, I'll build the package on Monday.

Most of the changes in the API seem to be extensions, but there is an
incompatible change in gps_read(). It has two new arguments.

Redis modules license change and the 'GoodFORM' project

Hi all,

This is a general notice about the 'Apache Commons Clause' license
change affecting several Redis Labs modules. In Fedora today the
'rejson' and 'rebloom' packages are affected.
<a href="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main#License_Changes" title="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main#License_Changes">https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main#License_Changes</a>

After much discussion, the Debian maintainer (of a similarly
re-licensed module) and I have decided to collaborate on maintaining
forks of the last open versions of these modules.

<a href="https://goodformcode.com/" title="https://goodformcode.com/">https://goodformcode.com/</a>

Any support you can show would be much appreciated - thanks!

cheers.

Successful build with mockbuild gives error in koji

Hi,
I have this build failing:
<a href="https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6308/30036308/build.log" title="https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6308/30036308/build.log">https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6308/30036308/build.log</a>

during documentation creation. However, the same build is successful
when I run it locally with fedpkg. For me, this is actually the first
time a local, successful mock build is failing in koji (for the same
arch) so I don't really know how to think about it.

Ideas?

Tengine: review request hanging

Hello!

This review request is pending. I'd like to know if anyone is
interested in reviewing it.
<a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150393" title="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150393">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150393</a>

Modularity is still confusing

I'm still very confused about how to do modular packaging in Fedora. I
don't know:

1. How do I create a module for a new Fedora package?
2. How do I create a module for my existing non-modular Fedora package?
3. How do I declare BuildRequires on my build dependencies from another module?
4. How do I declare Requires on my runtime dependencies from another module?
5. How do I know what modules are available?
6. How do I figure out which packages are in a particular module?
7.

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2018-10-04 16:00 UTC)

  Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2018-10-04 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.

  Local time information (via.

Syndicate content