DevHeads.net

Development

Fedora 30-20190406.n.1 compose check report

Missing expected images:

Atomichost qcow2 x86_64
Atomichost raw-xz x86_64

Failed openQA tests: 15/144 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm), 1/24 (i386)

ID: 378757 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/378757" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/378757">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/378757</a>
ID: 378768 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_no_user
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/378768" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/378768">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/378768</a>
ID: 378776 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/378776" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/378776">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/378776</a>
ID: 378780 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/378780" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/378780">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/378780</a>
ID:

Fedora 30 compose report: 20190406.n.1 changes

===== SUMMARY =====
Added images: 4
Dropped images: 3
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages: 1
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages: 6.10 MiB
Size of upgraded packages: 0 B
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages: 0 B
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

===== ADDED IMAGES =====
Image: Server raw-xz armhfp
Path: Server/armhfp/images/Fedora-Server-armhfp-30-20190406.n.1-sda.raw.xz
Image: Games live x86_64
Path: Labs/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Games-Live-x86_64-30-20190406.n.1.iso
Im

Need volunteer for a Go review

Hello,

Can anyone review:

Review Request: golang-github-anacrolix-dms - A UPnP DLNA Digital Media Server
that includes basic video
<a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684956" title="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684956">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684956</a>

This is the last piece I need to update rclone to 1.46.0, which was published
2 months ago already.

I'm available for any review in exchange.

Thanks,

Robert-André

Orphaning all my packages

Dear fellow developers,

I'm no longer able to maintain my packages on Fedora, due to lack of
time and power.

I am maintainer of:

aeskulap,
astyle,
codeblocks,
dvdbackup,
gnome-dvb-daemon,
gnome-shell-extension-openweather,
gnome-shell-extension-panel-osd

All packages build (as far as I know) except for gnome-dvb-daemon which
failed to build on fc30 mass-rebuild.

The two gnome-shell-extensions should be retired in my opinion, because
they are available via extensions.gnome.org (at the moment), but as I
am also upstream maintainer, the will not be continued (at least not by
me).

I'm also u

Fedora 30-20190405.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images:

Atomichost qcow2 x86_64
Atomichost raw-xz x86_64

Failed openQA tests: 17/144 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm), 1/24 (i386)

ID: 378368 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/378368" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/378368">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/378368</a>
ID: 378371 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/378371" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/378371">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/378371</a>
ID: 378384 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_no_user
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/378384" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/378384">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/378384</a>
ID: 378388 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/378388" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/378388">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/378388</a>
ID: 378395 Test: arm Mi

Fedora 30 Branched 20190405.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 30 Branched 20190405.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time.

2019-04-08 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora 30 Blocker Review Meeting

# F30 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2019-04-08
# Time: 16:00 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net

Hi folks! We have 5 proposed Final blockers to review, so let's have a
Fedora 30 blocker review meeting on Monday!

If you have time this weekend, you can take a look at the proposed or
accepted blockers before the meeting - the full lists can be found
here: <a href="https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/" title="https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/">https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/</a> .

We'll be evaluating these bugs to see if they violate any of the
Release Criteria and warrant the blocking of a release if they're not
fixed.

Proposal to CANCEL: 2019-04-08 Fedora QA Meeting

Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting on Monday. I think we
covered everything already, but if you're aware of anything important
we have to discuss this week, please do reply to this mail and we can
go ahead and run the meeting. Note there *will* be a blocker review
meeting.

Thanks, everyone!

Fedora 30 Final blocker status mail #1

Action summary
====================

Accepted blockers
2. <a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691832" title="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691832">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691832</a>
ACTION: Upstream rhinstaller maintainers to merge pull request

3. <a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691909" title="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691909">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691909</a>
ACTION: gdm maintainer to identify a fix

4. <a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1690429" title="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1690429">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1690429</a>
ACTION: Upstream gnome-shell developers to identify and fix issue

5.

Catch 22 in epel7 for %selinux_requires

Hello,

I maintain an selinux module package for el7, and recently came across
interesting macros [1] and in particular %selinux_requires that hides
the dirty detail and especially one that I missed when I set this up
back then.

Unfortunately, it appears to be provided by one of the packages it
BuildRequires itself:

Obsoleting LuxRender by luxcorerender

Starting from Fedora 30, LuxRender repository
(<a href="https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/LuxRender/" title="https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/LuxRender/">https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/LuxRender/</a>) is retired in favour of
luxcorerender (<a href="https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/luxcorender/" title="https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/luxcorender/">https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/luxcorender/</a>)
following upstream.

Unfortunately, I don't know how to move other members to the new
luxcorender repository and they
are free to join.

Thanks to proven packagers for making the process possible and keep up
with upstream.

Luya

Fedora 30 Beta Silverblue Feedback

Hi,

I didn't see a Silverblue specific mailing list and Fedora 30 is a beta
so hopefully this is right. If it isn't, where is the appropriate place?

Firstly I'd like to just say that the idea behind Fedora Silverblue is
really amazing. My understanding it's more orientated for containers and
the like however even for general desktop usage it's incredibly useful
as a recovery mechanism from things like bad GPU driver installs.
Indeed, after a failed attempt to build the driver using a guide[1] I
was left with a broken system on reboot.

Please revert the python-impacket package removal

Hello fellow packagers,

please am I the only one who doesn't like the way how the python2 packages
are being removed from Fedora?

I believe the package python-impacket should not have been removed.

Please Miro Hroncok can you revert the package removal?

The memo says:

"(Sub-)packages only providing python2 importable modules without additional
functionality will be removed from Fedora unless some other package(s)
depends on them."

Package python-impacket was providing whole bunch of utilities with
additional functionality like wmiexec.py and psexec.py, which currently do
n

luxcorerender failure to build

luxcorerender kept on failing despite fulfilling all necessary build
requirement. It occurred with slg-core which I vainly try to ignore it
as suggested by upstream.

Using %verify and %ghost and other issues for mass cleanups

Hi,

Looks like I found something to do for someone with proven packager
privileges (which allow straight modify of any Fedora package git repo
without asking package maintainer to do modification).
Submitting hundreds of separated PRs for all below cases does not make to
much sense and totally will consume few man/days and with proven packager
privs it should take minutes.

*!) (over)use %veryfy() with %ghost*

Just results of two commands:

[tkloczko@domek SPECS.fedora]$ grep %ghost * | grep %verify | awk -F:
'{print $1}' | sort | uniq | wc -l
45
[tkloczko@domek SPECS.fedora]$ grep %ghost *

Package Naming Guildelines for compat-lua packages

(This message is a copy for fedora-devel archival purposes, original
message was rejected by mailing list and was only sent to CCed maintainers)

Hi,

there is no official package naming guideline for lua packages in Fedora
[1].

Similarly to python2/python3, there are two version of lua: lua and
compat-lua. There is currently inconsistency in the package names for
compat-lua packages. Example:

compat-lua-lpeg vs. lua-cqueues-compat

This makes it difficult to search for lua packages and preferably, there
should be just a single naming scheme.

f28/f29 container composes failure since a while, is it already tracked by an issue ?

In fedora registry (1) we have f30/rawhide containers updated from last
compose (2)
but f28 last dated 20181007
but f29 last dated 20190218
Probably related to the DOOMED status reported in Container compose
(3) Where f28/f29 traceback.global file reports failures.

Is there already known issue tracking this Container compose failure ?

(1) <a href="https://registry.fedoraproject.org/repo/fedora/tags/" title="https://registry.fedoraproject.org/repo/fedora/tags/">https://registry.fedoraproject.org/repo/fedora/tags/</a>
(2)
<a href="https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/branched/latest-Fedora-30/compose/Container/" title="https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/branched/latest-Fedora-30/compose/Container/">https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/branched/latest-Fedora-30/com...</a>

<a href="https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/latest-Fedora-Rawhide/compose/Container/" title="https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/latest-Fedora-Rawhide/compose/Container/">https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/latest-Fedora-Rawhide...</a>
(3)

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2019-04-04 16:00 UTC)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2019-04-04 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net.

Local time information (via.

Maintainer test instances

Greetings.

This is a periodic reminder that we have some test instances setup for
package maintainers. Please see:

<a href="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Machine_Resources_For_Package_Maintainers" title="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Machine_Resources_For_Package_Maintainers">https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Machine_Resources_For_Package_Mainta...</a>

for more information.

Additionally, I have just added 2 aarch64 instances (running Fedora 29).

I hope folks will find them useful.

kevin

Fedora Rawhide-20190403.n.1 compose check report

Missing expected images:

Atomichost qcow2 x86_64
Atomichost raw-xz x86_64

Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
8 of 47 required tests failed, 4 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
FAILED: compose.cloud.all

Failed openQA tests: 33/144 (x86_64), 4/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)

ID: 377258 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller **GATING**
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/377258" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/377258">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/377258</a>
ID: 377259 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_r

Heads up: OpenColorIO 1.1.1

There's no soname change and fedabidiff output doesn't look to concerning
but I'm no expert there:

[C]'method void
OpenColorIO::v1::Processor::Impl::addColorSpaceConversion(const
OpenColorIO::v1::Config&, const OpenColorIO::v1::ConstContextRcPtr&, const
OpenColorIO::v1::ConstColorSpaceRcPtr&, const
OpenColorIO::v1::ConstColorSpaceRcPtr&)' at Processor.h:96:1 has some
indirect sub-type changes:
parameter 2 of type 'const OpenColorIO::v1::ConstContextRcPtr&' has
sub-type changes:
in referenced type 'const OpenColorIO::v1::ConstContextRcPtr':
in unqualified underlying

Planned Outage: Taskotron 2019-04-09 16:00 UTC

There will be an outage starting at 2019-04-09 16:00 UTC, which will
last approximately 4 hours.

To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
<a href="http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto" title="http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto">http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto</a> or run:

date -d '2019-04-09 16:00UTC'

Reason for outage:

Major upgrade to Taskotron

Affected Services:

Taskotron
Bodhi (displaying results)
Greenwave

Ticket Link:

<a href="https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/7686" title="https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/7686">https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/7686</a>

Please join #fedora-admin or #fedora-noc on irc.freenode.net or add
comments to the ticket for this outage above.

Modularity question for packagers about rolling/latest/stable/master streams

Some modules now use "latest", "stable", or "master" as stream names for
various different things.

Fedora 30-20190403.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images:

Atomichost qcow2 x86_64
Atomichost raw-xz x86_64

Failed openQA tests: 6/144 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm), 2/24 (i386)

ID: 377082 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/377082" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/377082">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/377082</a>
ID: 377089 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/377089" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/377089">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/377089</a>
ID: 377105 Test: x86_64 universal support_server
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/377105" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/377105">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/377105</a>
ID: 377110 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_ext3@uefi
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/377110" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/377110">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/377110</a>
ID: 377140 Test: x86

Can someone do this quick Golang review please?

Hello,

I need a quick review of: <a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1695371" title="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1695371">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1695371</a>

It's a standard Golang package, it builds in Koji.

I'm available for any swap in exchange.

Thanks,

Robert-André

Fedora 30-20190402.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images:

Atomichost raw-xz x86_64
Atomichost qcow2 x86_64

Failed openQA tests: 1/2 (arm), 5/144 (x86_64)

ID: 376425 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/376425" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/376425">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/376425</a>
ID: 376441 Test: x86_64 universal support_server
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/376441" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/376441">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/376441</a>
ID: 376476 Test: x86_64 universal install_iscsi
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/376476" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/376476">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/376476</a>
ID: 376484 Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_free_space@uefi
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/376484" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/376484">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/376484</a>
ID: 376505 Test: x86_64 univers

firefox-wayland and URLs in other programs

Hi All,

To help testing firefox on wayland I'm running it as my day to day browser
now, but when I click links (specifically in thunderbird) I get a dialog
saying "firefox is running but not responding". I believe this is caused
by thunderbird spawning /usr/bin/firefox to open the link instead of
firefox-wayland.

Any ideas how to fix this?

Fedora Rawhide-20190402.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images:

Atomichost qcow2 x86_64
Atomichost raw-xz x86_64

Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
8 of 47 required tests failed, 4 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below

Failed openQA tests: 28/144 (x86_64), 4/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)

ID: 375917 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default **GATING**
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/375917" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/375917">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/375917</a>
ID: 375925 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller **GATING**
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/375925" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/375925">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/375925</a>
ID: 375926 Test: x86_64 Serve

Fedora 30 Beta Release Announcement

Fedora 30 Beta Released
We're excited to announce the release of Fedora 30 Beta.

A short list of highlights:

* New desktop environment options - DeepinDE and Pantheon Desktop join
GNOME, KDE Plasma, Xfce, and others

* DNF performance improvements

* The Workstation edition of Fedora 30 Beta features GNOME 3.32

* And more...

For more details about the release, read the full announcement at

* <a href="https://fedoramagazine.org/announcing-the-release-of-fedora-30-beta/" title="https://fedoramagazine.org/announcing-the-release-of-fedora-30-beta/">https://fedoramagazine.org/announcing-the-release-of-fedora-30-beta/</a>

or look for the prerelease pages in the download sections at

* <a href="https://getfedora.org/" title="https://getfedora.org/">https://getfedora.org/</a>

Since

Orphaning packages

Hi,

I just orphaned the following packages:

- linsmith
- python-deltasigma
- piklab
- ahkab

Feel free to take it if you want to.

Best regards,

Reminder meeting : Modularity Team (weekly)

Dear all,

You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Modularity Team (weekly) on 2019-04-02 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC
At <a href="mailto:fedora-meeting- ... at irc dot freenode.net">fedora-meeting- ... at irc dot freenode.net</a>

The meeting will be about:
Meeting of the Modularity Team.

More information available at: [Modularity Team Docs](<a href="https://docs.pagure.org/modularity/" title="https://docs.pagure.org/modularity/">https://docs.pagure.org/modularity/</a>)

The agenda for the meeting is available as flagged tickets [in the Modularity repository](<a href="https://pagure.io/modularity/issues?status=Open&amp;tags=Meeting" title="https://pagure.io/modularity/issues?status=Open&amp;tags=Meeting">https://pagure.io/modularity/issues?status=Open&amp;tags=Meeting</a>).

Source: <a href="https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/9480/" title="https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/9480/">https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/9480/</a>

Orphaned packages to be retired

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
<a href="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life" title="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life">https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life</a>

Note: If you received this mail directly you (co)maintain one of the affected
packages or a package that depends on one.

Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 29.20190401.0

A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update:

Version: 29.20190401.0
Commit(x86_64): a39e99a72c80c9c4a8fce8a2092b2856f742a5c3ba5c9bedd59a9e76aa3e9924
Commit(aarch64): 5f9af9bc6c28829c93bbd0945d3e54205943b912e6fa2660f6fa3559a835494b
Commit(ppc64le): cba5130d5355a5c087986de86613a9c66a200e8d88d8a5c13e082c9385cda317

We are releasing images from multiple architectures but please note
that x86_64 architecture is the only one that undergoes automated
testing at this time.

Existing systems can be upgraded in place via e.g.

Fedora 30-20190401.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images:

Atomichost qcow2 x86_64
Atomichost raw-xz x86_64

Failed openQA tests: 6/144 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)

ID: 375428 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_browser
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/375428" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/375428">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/375428</a>
ID: 375451 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/375451" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/375451">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/375451</a>
ID: 375465 Test: x86_64 universal install_btrfs
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/375465" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/375465">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/375465</a>
ID: 375467 Test: x86_64 universal support_server
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/375467" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/375467">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/375467</a>
ID: 375502 Test: x86_64 universal i

Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal:

<a href="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GatingRawhidePackages" title="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GatingRawhidePackages">https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GatingRawhidePackages</a>

Note that this was previously submitted as "Gating Rawhide - Single
package updates":
<a href="https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ ... at lists dot fedoraproject.org/thread/SBB3DJO27HDDO6NAW54CLH2M62FEG622/" title="https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ ... at lists dot fedoraproject.org/thread/SBB3DJO27HDDO6NAW54CLH2M62FEG622/">https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ ... at lists dot fedoraproject....</a>

== Summary ==
We want to gate packages on test results before they can land in
rawhide.

Modularity UX Questions

Last month, we had a Modularity Hackfest in Boston. I wrote up a
hackfest report at the Community Blog[1] back then, which included
several open questions related to how to handle stream and profile
defaults. I'm reprinting them here on Fedora Devel for public input.

== Open Questions ==
We had some discussions throughout the course of the hackfest that
didn’t reach a clear consensus. The most contentious was around what
to do about empty profile data.

Fedora Rawhide-20190401.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images:

Atomichost raw-xz x86_64
Atomichost qcow2 x86_64

Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
8 of 47 required tests failed, 4 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
FAILED: compose.cloud.all

Failed openQA tests: 28/144 (x86_64), 3/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)

ID: 375220 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller **GATING**
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/375220" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/375220">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/375220</a>
ID: 375221 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_r

Schedule for Monday's FESCo Meeting (2019-04-01)

Open Floor meeting instead.

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Monday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.

To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
<a href="http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto" title="http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto">http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto</a>

or run:
date -d '2019-04-01 15:00 UTC'

Links to all issues to be discussed can be found at:
<a href="https://pagure.io/fesco/report/meeting_agenda" title="https://pagure.io/fesco/report/meeting_agenda">https://pagure.io/fesco/report/meeting_agenda</a>

= Discussed and Voted in the Ticket =

= Followups =

= New business =

= Open Floor =

For more complete details, please visit each individual
issue.

changing default sudoers file

Hi, I would like to change default sudoers file according to [1] proposed
patch is in a pull request [2]. Koji build is located here [3]. Planed
merge 14th of April 2019.

I would like to remove PS1 and PS2 variables from env_keep due to security
risks showed in bz [1].

[1] - <a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1676925" title="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1676925">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1676925</a>
[2] - <a href="https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/sudo/pull-request/9" title="https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/sudo/pull-request/9">https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/sudo/pull-request/9</a>
[3] - <a href="https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=33864189" title="https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=33864189">https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=33864189</a>

oidn package

Hello team,

oidn package is ready for review as dependant for luxcorerender.

<a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694553" title="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694553">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694553</a>

I will gladly do a review swap when needed.

Thanks.

Luya

PSA: workaround for segfault when running dnf update in F30

<tl;dr>
librepo-1.9.6 has a major bug that will cause a segfault when a
repository has zchunk metadata. To temporarily work around the
problem, set zchunk=False in /etc/dnf/dnf.conf or wait until the next
updates push comes out
</tl;dr>

About a week ago, we disabled zchunk metadata in the main F30
repository because of arm-specific compose problems[1].

clang segmentation fault on armv7hf

I'm working on building PySide2 for Fedora and have a problem with clang
segfaulting only on armv7hf[1]...

The source package has shiboken2, pyside2, and pyside2-tools in one big
archive but I am building shiboken2 and pyside2-tools with GCC and only
pyside2 with clang because if makes use of something clang specific.

[ 1%] Building CXX object
libpyside/CMakeFiles/pyside2.dir/pysidesignal.cpp.o
cd
/builddir/build/BUILD/pyside-setup-everywhere-src-5.12.1/armv7hl-linux/pyside2/libpyside
&& /usr/bin/clang++ -DPYSIDE_EXPORTS -DPYSIDE_QML_PRIVATE_API_SUPPORT=1
-DPYSIDE_QML_SUPPORT=1 -DQT_CORE_L

dnf crashes make fedpkg / mock unusable

Hi everybody,

Since about one or two days, I am completely unable to build any
packages with fedpkg locally, and even running dnf on the host system
is really crashy.

It looks like dnf crashes while it's refreshing repository metadata.
ABRT won't let me report the issue due to "low informational value" of
the backtrace, but it looks like SEGFAULT in libcurl:

Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
#0 0x00007fad55077f22 in ?? () from /lib64/libcurl.so.4
(...)

However, there's not been any recent curl update for f29 AFAICT.

Fedora Rawhide-20190331.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images:

Atomichost qcow2 x86_64
Atomichost raw-xz x86_64

Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
5 of 47 required tests failed, 4 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
FAILED: compose.cloud.all

Failed openQA tests: 21/144 (x86_64), 3/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)

ID: 374779 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/374779" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/374779">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/374779</a>
ID: 374811 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: <a href="https://openq" title="https://openq">https://openq</a>

provider bad repo (network) or bug development ?

Dear team.

Take a look at my output ( see time and bad response of dnf tool versus
kivi package)
I don't sure it is a bug or development issue( the fedora.pkgs.org/29/ has
a kivy package).
I don't have many options to test it , but you can have a good image on it.
Can be a clone or bad repo?
Thank you.

Fedora 30-20190330.n.3 compose check report

Missing expected images:

Atomichost raw-xz x86_64
Atomichost qcow2 x86_64

Failed openQA tests: 1/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm), 5/144 (x86_64)

ID: 374629 Test: i386 Server-dvd-iso install_default
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/374629" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/374629">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/374629</a>
ID: 374668 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/374668" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/374668">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/374668</a>
ID: 374684 Test: x86_64 universal support_server
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/374684" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/374684">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/374684</a>
ID: 374691 Test: x86_64 universal install_kickstart_hdd
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/374691" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/374691">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/374691</a>
ID: 374706 Test: x86_6

VirtualBox 6 and Vagrant in Fedora 29

Hello,

If like me you use Vagrant with VirtualBox, you may see an update to
version 6 from RPM Fusion free for f29.

Fedora 30 Branched 20190330.n.3 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 30 Branched 20190330.n.3. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time.

2019-04-01 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora 30 Blocker Review Meeting

# F30 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2019-04-01
# Time: 16:00 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net

Hi folks! We have 2 proposed and 5 accepted Final blockers to review,
so let's have a Fedora 30 blocker review meeting on Monday!

If you have time this weekend, you can take a look at the proposed or
accepted blockers before the meeting - the full lists can be found
here: <a href="https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/" title="https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/">https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/</a> .

We'll be evaluating these bugs to see if they violate any of the
Release Criteria and warrant the blocking of a release if they're not
fixed.

2019-04-01 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2019-04-01
# Time: 15:00 UTC
(<a href="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto" title="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto">https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto</a>)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net

Greetings testers!

We didn't meet for the last few weeks, so let's get together and see
where we're at and plan out the rest of the Fedora 30 cycle.

No, this announcement is not an April Fool, there really *will* be a
meeting!

If anyone has any other items for the agenda, please reply to this
email and suggest them! Thanks.

== Proposed Agenda Topics ==

1. Previous meeting follow-up
2. Fedora 30 status
3.

Stewardship SIG: Initial report and plans for the future

Hi everybody,

It looks like the first round of orphans has been taken in by our SIG - this
seemed to be a good time to do inventory and think about how to proceed.

Status Report
First of all, I've written a small script [0] that produces a simple HTML page
of the current status of the stewardship-SIG packager group. Pull Requests to
improve the report are welcome.

The current status is available at [1].

Syndicate content