DevHeads.net

Development

Fedora Rawhide-20171010.n.1 compose check report

Missing expected images:

Server dvd i386
Workstation live i386
Server boot i386
Kde live i386

Failed openQA tests: 88/128 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)

New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20171008.n.0):

ID: 155169 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_no_user
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/155169" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/155169">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/155169</a>
ID: 155200 Test: x86_64 Atomic-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/155200" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/155200">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/155200</a>
ID: 155201 Test: x86_64 Atomic-dvd_ostree-iso install_default
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/155201" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/155201">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/155201</a>
ID: 155214 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_mini

Fedora 27-20171011.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images:

Server dvd i386
Workstation live i386
Server boot i386
Kde live i386

Failed openQA tests: 17/128 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)

ID: 155668 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_services_start
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/155668" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/155668">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/155668</a>
ID: 155684 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/155684" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/155684">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/155684</a>
ID: 155688 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso base_services_start
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/155688" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/155688">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/155688</a>
ID: 155690 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/test" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/test">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/test</a>

Why is Fx 57 in Updates Testing?

Was this on purpose? Fx 57 is BETA, and I was under the impression that
BETA software was for RAWHIDE.

Yes, I understand there is an annotation NOT to push Fx 57 to stable - but
I thought that was the purpose of updates testing... software there is
intended to be tested and pushed to stable.

There are many extensions which aren't yet available for Fx 57 - and we're
effectively moving up the timetable by putting it in updates testing.

Fedora 27-20171010.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images:

Server dvd i386
Workstation live i386
Server boot i386
Kde live i386

Failed openQA tests: 12/128 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)

New failures (same test did not fail in 27-20171008.n.0):

ID: 154881 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default_upload
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/154881" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/154881">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/154881</a>
ID: 154892 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_services_start_arm
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/154892" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/154892">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/154892</a>

Old failures (same test failed in 27-20171008.n.0):

ID: 154852 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_services_start
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/154852" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/154852">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/154852</a>
ID:

How should we handle gnupg v1.4.X as gpg1?

The time for change is finally, almost here :) Upstream is talking about
installing the v1.4 series as gpg1.

Incomaptible changes in new package for f27

Hello all!

I seek advice how to proceed with following situation.

There is new package for f27 - java-9-openjdk.

It have been first built some two or three months ago. For f27.

libselinux golang bindings will be dropped from Rawhide

Hi,

libselinux golang bindings [1] haven't been touched since 2014, have
never been upstreamed, nothing requires/uses them in Fedora and since
there's another SELinux golang bindings maintained by opencontainers [2]
I'm going to drop them from Fedora Rawhide.

[1] <a href="https://github.com/fedora-selinux/selinux/tree/master/libselinux/golang" title="https://github.com/fedora-selinux/selinux/tree/master/libselinux/golang">https://github.com/fedora-selinux/selinux/tree/master/libselinux/golang</a>
[2] <a href="https://github.com/opencontainers/selinux" title="https://github.com/opencontainers/selinux">https://github.com/opencontainers/selinux</a>

Thanks,

Petr

Fedora 27 Modular Server Beta Go/No-Go Meeting on Thursday, October 12th @ 17:00 UTC

Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-1 for this important
meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the Fedora 27
Modular Server Beta.

The meeting is going to be held on Thursday, October 12th, 2017 at
17:00 UTC. Please check the [1] link for your time zone.

[1] <a href="https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/7123/" title="https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/7123/">https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/7123/</a>
[2] <a href="http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/milestone/27/beta/buglist" title="http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/milestone/27/beta/buglist">http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/milestone/27/beta/buglist</a>

Thank you in advance for your support.
Regards, Jan

Reminder meeting : Modularity Office Hours

Dear all,

You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Modularity Office Hours on 2017-10-10 from 10:00:00 to 11:00:00 US/Eastern
At <a href="https://meet.jit.si/fedora-modularity" title="https://meet.jit.si/fedora-modularity">https://meet.jit.si/fedora-modularity</a>

The meeting will be about:
This is where you ask the Fedora Modularity Team questions (and we try to answer them)!

Join us on [IRC](irc://chat.freenode.net/#fedora-modularity): #fedora-modularity on [FreeNode](<a href="https://freenode.net" title="https://freenode.net">https://freenode.net</a>)

Source: <a href="https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/5910/" title="https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/5910/">https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/5910/</a>

heads up: libxc soname bump

Hi,

I'm updating libxc in rawhide to version 4.0.1. This update contains a
soname bump, so rebuilds of dependent packages will be necessary:

- cp2k
- gpaw
- elk
- exciting

I don't think there have been any API changes, so the rebuilds should go
smoothly. I'll take care of the rebuilds.

Fedora 27-20171009.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images:

Server dvd i386
Workstation live i386
Server boot i386
Kde live i386

Failed openQA tests: 16/128 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)

ID: 154341 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/154341" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/154341">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/154341</a>
ID: 154353 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_services_start
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/154353" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/154353">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/154353</a>
ID: 154358 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_basic
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/154358" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/154358">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/154358</a>
ID: 154373 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso base_services_start
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/154373" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/154373">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/154373</a>
ID: 154

Fedora 27 compose report: 20171009.n.0 changes

===== SUMMARY =====
Added images: 3
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages: 0
Upgraded packages: 4
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages: 0.00 B
Size of dropped packages: 0.00 B
Size of upgraded packages: 8.95 MiB
Size of downgraded packages: 0.00 B

Size change of upgraded packages: 517.90 KiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 0.00 B

===== ADDED IMAGES =====
Image: Server boot ppc64le
Path: Server/ppc64le/iso/Fedora-Server-netinst-ppc64le-27-20171009.n.0.iso
Image: Cloud_Base qcow2 ppc64
Path: CloudImages/ppc64/images/Fedora-Cloud-Ba

fedora-review issues

Is anyone having problems with the output of fedora-review?

I've done two reviews [1] with a lot of false positives:

* I get a notice of header files must be in -devel subpackage because
fedora-review considers header files in -debugsource subpackage to
be wrong
* I get a long list of directories owned by other packages
* The rpmlint output of installed packages seems to be unable to open
URLs (and I also get a "sh: /usr/bin/python: No such file or directory")

I found no open bugs on pagure for those issues, am I the only one who
see them?

Mattia

[1]https://bugzilla.red

Fedora Rawhide-20171009.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images:

Server dvd i386
Workstation live i386
Server boot i386
Kde live i386

Failed openQA tests: 78/126 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)

ID: 154117 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/154117" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/154117">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/154117</a>
ID: 154118 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/154118" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/154118">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/154118</a>
ID: 154120 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/154120" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/154120">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/154120</a>
ID: 154121 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/154121" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/154121">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/154121</a>
ID: 154123 T

Heads up: fwupd in rawhide (not f27) will bump the soname

The only thing in Fedora using libfwupd is currently gnome-software,
which will also be rebuilt by me (as also the upstream maintainer).

Any problems, yell.

Richard.

New SIG: OpenStack

Hi,

I'd like to announce the beginning of a new SIG: OpenStack.

During these last years, I've been more or less maintaining OpenStack
clients, and I'd like to pass over
that (burden) to a SIG.
OpenStack clients/libraries are quite tied to each other, so it is
difficult to maintain them without provenpackager
permissions, and it is also a lot of work to sync requirements, do the
testing.

Proposal to cancel: 2017-10-09 Fedora QA Meeting

Hi, we'll be heavily focusing on F27 Final testing and I don't know about
any urgent topic to discuss, so I propose we cancel this meeting. If you
have any topics, please send them to test list and we'll discuss them there.

Thanks,
Kamil

2017-10-09 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora 27 Blocker Review Meeting

# F27 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2017-10-09
# Time: 16:00 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net

Hi folks! There are currently some proposed release blockers,
so let's have a Fedora 27 blocker review meeting.

If you have time today, you can take a look at the proposed or
accepted blockers before the meeting - the full lists can be found
here: <a href="https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/" title="https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/">https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/</a> .

We'll be evaluating these bugs to see if they violate any of the
Release Criteria and warrant the blocking of a release if they're not
fixed.

Non-responsive maintainer: jcapik

Hi,

I'd like to start the non-responsive maintainer process for Jaromir
Capik (jcapik). I've been trying to contact him through a bugzilla, but
haven't received a reply in over two weeks:
<a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1494142" title="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1494142">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1494142</a>

I also attempted to contact him directly using email on 2017-09-01 and
then on 2017-09-13, but I didn't receive a reply.

It appears he hasn't been active in Fedora in a while.

Planned outage: koji / buildsystem - 2017-10-09 21:00 UTC

There will be an outage starting at 2017-10-09 21:00UTC, which will last
approximately 4 hours.

To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
<a href="http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto" title="http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto">http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto</a>

or run:

date -d '2017-10-09 21:00UTC'

Reason for outage:

We will be upgrading koji to the latest version as well as updating
various koji related services (db server, etc).

Affected Services:

koji, koschei, and build related systems will be up and down in the
outage window.

Contact Information:

Ticket Link:

<a href="https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/6433" title="https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/6433">https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/6433</a>

Please join #fedora-admin or

Depending on pygobject3 may cause an unnecessary dependency on cairo

Dear fellow Fedora developers!
I was puzzled by this after upgrading from F25 to F26 on a headless
machine with a pretty minimal set of packages installed (i.e. almost
no libraries related to Xorg or mesa). The upgrade brought in an
updated abrt package which grew a dependency on
python-gobject/python3-gobject. That, in itself, wouldn't be so bad,
but python-gobject pulls in cairo and over 20 other libraries related
to graphical display.

Fedora 27-20171008.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images:

Server dvd i386
Workstation live i386
Server boot i386
Kde live i386

Failed openQA tests: 15/128 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)

New failures (same test did not fail in 27-20171007.n.0):

ID: 153858 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_browser
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/153858" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/153858">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/153858</a>
ID: 153875 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_browser
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/153875" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/153875">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/153875</a>
ID: 153883 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/153883" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/153883">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/153883</a>

Old failures (same test failed in 27-20171007.n.0

Fedora 27 Branched 20171008.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 27 Branched 20171008.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time.

Fedora Rawhide-20171008.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images:

Server dvd i386
Workstation live i386
Server boot i386
Kde live i386

Failed openQA tests: 78/126 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)

New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20171007.n.0):

ID: 153705 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default_upload
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/153705" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/153705">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/153705</a>
ID: 153740 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_64bit
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/153740" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/153740">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/153740</a>

Old failures (same test failed in Rawhide-20171007.n.0):

ID: 153661 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/153661" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/153661">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/153661</a>

Fedora Rawhide-20171007.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images:

Server dvd i386
Workstation live i386
Server boot i386
Kde live i386

Failed openQA tests: 79/126 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)

New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20171006.n.0):

ID: 153296 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/153296" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/153296">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/153296</a>
ID: 153300 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso base_services_start
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/153300" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/153300">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/153300</a>
ID: 153310 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/153310" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/153310">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/153310</a>
ID: 153317 Test: x86_64 KDE-live

Fedora 27-20171007.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images:

Server dvd i386
Workstation live i386
Server boot i386
Kde live i386

Failed openQA tests: 17/128 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)

New failures (same test did not fail in 27-20171006.n.0):

ID: 153431 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_cockpit
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/153431" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/153431">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/153431</a>
ID: 153432 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_basic
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/153432" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/153432">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/153432</a>
ID: 153438 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/153438" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/153438">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/153438</a>
ID: 153517 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_lvmthin
U

orphaning OpenStego

Dear Developpers,

I'm sorry to inform you I orphaned OpenStego package, I can't maintain
it anymore. The software doesn't work in fedora since two updates,
upstream is not able to fix the problem (first report was in 2012
IIRC). It is a very old package and should be retired in six weeks.

Best regards,
Casper

is anybody using fedora-loadmodules.service and fedora-readonly.service?

Two boot-time services provided by the venerable initscripts package:

– fedora-loadmodules.service: this loads kernel modules based on
configuration in /etc/rc.modules. Identical functionality is provided by
systemd-modules-load.service. (systemd-modules-load.service reads
modules-load.d directories and the kernel command line, not /etc/rc.modules).

Is anybody still using /etc/rc.modules?

Fedora Rawhide-20171006.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images:

Server dvd i386
Workstation live i386
Server boot i386
Kde live i386

Failed openQA tests: 85/126 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)

New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20171004.n.0):

ID: 152875 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/152875" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/152875">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/152875</a>
ID: 152876 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_no_user
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/152876" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/152876">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/152876</a>
ID: 152877 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/152877" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/152877">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/152877</a>
ID: 152878 Test: x86_64 Workstation-liv

Fedora 27-20171006.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images:

Atomic qcow2 x86_64
Server dvd i386
Workstation live i386
Server boot i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Kde live i386

Failed openQA tests: 12/128 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)

ID: 153107 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_services_start
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/153107" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/153107">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/153107</a>
ID: 153127 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso base_services_start
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/153127" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/153127">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/153127</a>
ID: 153137 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/153137" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/153137">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/153137</a>
ID: 153144 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso base_services_start
URL: http

plan to update F27 to systemd-235

Hi,

systemd 235 was released today. A large number of issues was closed
upstream, including many bug fixes, documentation updates, and
long-standing RFEs. There are some new features, but relatively few
entirely new features or changes in behaviour that impact other
services. There also are no (intentional) breaking changes.

The update is building for rawhide. If nothing major pops up, I'd like
to release the update for F27 too.

Re: Removing ghostscript-fonts package

NACK. They are _extra_ fonts:
<a href="http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git;a=blob_plain;f=Resource/Init/Fontmap.GS" title="http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git;a=blob_plain;f=Resource/Init/Fontmap.GS">http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git;a=blob_plain;f=Resource/Init/...</a>

Removing ghostscript-fonts package

Hi,

I am going to retire ghostscript-fonts package in F27 because its fonts
are deprecated and replaced by urw-base35-fonts package. Only package
which depends on ghostscript-fonts seems to be hylafax+ package, I
created bugzilla for it
<a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1499240" title="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1499240">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1499240</a> . Does anyone have
any objections on its retirement?

If there isn't any objections, I'll retire it next Monday.

Zdenek

Self Introduction: Madison Kelly (digimer)

Hello,

I'm fairly new to packaging. I helped maintain the 'cluster' package
some years back, but haven't done packaging since it was retired when
F16 went EOL.

I'm lead developer of the Anvil! Intelligent Availability platform, a
fully open source "smart" high availability cluster appliance that hosts
and protects critical KVM/qemu servers
(https://www.alteeve.com/w/What_is_an_Anvil!_and_why_do_I_care%3F).

I work for Alteeve, the company that built and maintains the Anvil!
project.

System Upgrade F26 -> F27 Fails

System upgrade re-boot fails with Error in
`/usr/libexec/system-python' free() invalid pointer

Upgrade failed at reboot. System rebooted to F26 successfully.

I did two other systems without any problems.

<a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1499101" title="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1499101">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1499101</a>

Fedora 27-20171005.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images:

Server dvd i386
Workstation live i386
Server boot i386
Kde live i386

Failed openQA tests: 12/128 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)

New failures (same test did not fail in 27-20171004.n.0):

ID: 152482 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_basic
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/152482" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/152482">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/152482</a>

Old failures (same test failed in 27-20171004.n.0):

ID: 152477 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_services_start
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/152477" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/152477">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/152477</a>
ID: 152497 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso base_services_start
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/152497" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/152497">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/152497</a>
ID: 1

Fedora 27 Branched 20171005.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 27 Branched 20171005.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time.

Bodhi now has a "batched" request state

Greetings fellow Fedora friends!

bodhi-2.11.0[0] has been deployed to production, and this release
introduces a new state for updates where the request can be "batched".
The purpose of this state is to give updates a place to sit once they've
reached the stable requirements until the next weekly batch update push.
There is a cron that is set to run on Tuesday's at 03:00 UTC that will
switch all "request: batched" updates to "request: stable"
automatically, and they will then proceed the next time releng does a
push each week.

I know this was a bit controversial when discussed here in the pas

poppler soname bump

Hi,

I will build a new release of poppler this week, which includes soname
bump. I will take care of rebuilding the affected packages:

boomaga
calligra
cups-filters
evas-generic-loaders
gambas3
gdal
gdcm
inkscape
kf5-kfilemetadata
libreoffice
okular
pdf2djvu
poppler-sharp
texlive
texworks

Note that packages that only use one of the wrappers (poppler-cpp,
poppler-glib, poppler-qt{4,5}) are not affected.

D.

Build stuck setting up buildroot

I started an F27 build this morning:

<a href="https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=979845" title="https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=979845">https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=979845</a>

Hours later, all arches but 32-bit ARM have finished. The 32-bit ARM
build appears to be stuck setting up the buildroot.

Fedora 27-20171004.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images:

Server dvd i386
Workstation live i386
Server boot i386
Kde live i386

Failed openQA tests: 13/128 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)

New failures (same test did not fail in 27-20171003.n.0):

ID: 152080 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/152080" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/152080">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/152080</a>
ID: 152128 Test: x86_64 universal install_european_language
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/152128" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/152128">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/152128</a>

Old failures (same test failed in 27-20171003.n.0):

ID: 152055 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_services_start
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/152055" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/152055">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/152055</a>
ID: 15207

Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2017-10-06)

The following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.

To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
<a href="http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto" title="http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto">http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto</a>

or run:
date -d '2017-10-06 16:00 UTC'

Links to all issues below can be found at:
<a href="https://pagure.io/fesco/report/meeting_agenda" title="https://pagure.io/fesco/report/meeting_agenda">https://pagure.io/fesco/report/meeting_agenda</a>

= New business =

#topic #1779 Consider fedora-* initscript units
.fesco 1779
<a href="https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1779" title="https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1779">https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1779</a>

#topic #1780 F28 System Wide Change: Annobin
.fesco 1780
<a href="https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1780" title="https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1780">https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1780</a>

= Open Floor =

For more c

Fedora 27 compose report: 20171004.n.0 changes

===== SUMMARY =====
Added images: 1
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages: 1
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages: 0.00 B
Size of dropped packages: 80.82 KiB
Size of upgraded packages: 0.00 B
Size of downgraded packages: 0.00 B

Size change of upgraded packages: 0.00 B
Size change of downgraded packages: 0.00 B

===== ADDED IMAGES =====
Image: Atomic dvd-ostree x86_64
Path: Atomic/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Atomic-ostree-x86_64-27-20171004.n.0.iso

===== DROPPED IMAGES =====
Image: Atomic dvd-ostree ppc64le
Path: Atomic/ppc

Odd message when escalating priveledge with sudo - F27 - LXQt - QTerminal ( Apologies if wrong list )

I just saw this and haven't had time to search Bugzilla yet;

[jkrong@masada ~]$ sudo su
/etc/selinux/targeted/contexts/files/file_contexts.bin: line 1 error due to: Non-ASCII characters found
/etc/selinux/targeted/contexts/files/file_contexts.homedirs.bin: line 1 error due to: Non-ASCII characters found
[root@masada jkrong]#

Should I send to some selinux list or report as bug or ???

Thanks,
Zach
#aikidouke

F28 Self Contained Change: Facter3

= Proposed Self Contained Change: Facter3 =
<a href="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Facter3" title="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Facter3">https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Facter3</a>

Change owner(s):
* James Hogarth < ... at fedoraproject dot org>

This is an update of the Facter package from 2.X to 3.X.

Fedora Rawhide-20171004.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images:

Server dvd i386
Workstation live i386
Server boot i386
Kde live i386

Failed openQA tests: 77/126 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)

New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20171003.n.1):

ID: 151880 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/151880" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/151880">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/151880</a>
ID: 151893 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default_upload
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/151893" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/151893">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/151893</a>
ID: 151903 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload
URL: <a href="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/151903" title="https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/151903">https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/151903</a>

Old failures (same test fail

New package maintainer

Hi all, As requested, I just wanted to say hello and introduce myself as a new package maintainer. I'm a researcher in the area of Internet protocols, with an emphasis in the Domain Name System (DNS). My foray into the open source software world is a tool I developed for DNS analysis and visualization called DNSViz, for which I would like to maintain a Fedora package. Here is the link to the (approved) review request: <a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1497482" title="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1497482">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1497482</a>. I look forward to working with other developers and package maintainers.

Syndicate content