DevHeads.net

Is system-config-users maintained or not?

Hi,

it seems system-config-users is broken [1],
and appears to have no upstream [2].

Do we maintain it at this point at all? Should it be retired "for safety"?

[1] <a href="https://bugz.fedoraproject.org/system-config-users" title="https://bugz.fedoraproject.org/system-config-users">https://bugz.fedoraproject.org/system-config-users</a>
[2]
<a href="https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/system-config-users/blob/master/f/system-config-users.spec#_44" title="https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/system-config-users/blob/master/f/system-config-users.spec#_44">https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/system-config-users/blob/master/f/sys...</a>

Comments

Re: Is system-config-users maintained or not?

By Nils Philippsen at 02/04/2019 - 07:35

On Sat, 2019-02-02 at 09:30 +0100, Miro HronĨok wrote:
IIRC, Moez picked up maintenance from me long ago when I wanted to
retire it. As far as I'm concerned, it can go. Moez?

Nils

Re: Is system-config-users maintained or not?

By =?ISO-8859-1?Q?... at 02/04/2019 - 15:13

On Mon, 2019-02-04 at 13:35 +0100, Nils Philippsen wrote:
A big BTW
I know Moez , he co-maintain some packages with me ...
But his activity seems zero since we have pagure as
src.fedoraproject.org ...
I think he pick these packages to maintain package alive (like I did
for other packages) but now that we want it retired, what we need to do
? if user is more or less unresponsive ? start an non-responsive
maintainer ? or could we be more direct and ask an admin to retire the
package ?

I have two other cases [1]

[1]
<a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307681" title="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307681">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307681</a>
<a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565895" title="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565895">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565895</a>