DevHeads.net

Update to 0ad-0.18

Hi,

In case you would like to see it faster in Fedora :)

0ad-0.18 needs mozjs31, so I need this package reviewed
and approved:
<a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202131" title="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202131">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202131</a>

For rawhide I also need gloox rebuilt for the new
c++ string and list abi:
<a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202059" title="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202059">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202059</a>

I pushed commits for 0ad and 0ad-data only for rawhide,
but requiring the new mozjs31 package, and gloox rebuilt,
"it works for me".

Thanks,
Paulo

Comments

Re: Update to 0ad-0.18

By Zbigniew =?utf-... at 03/15/2015 - 16:32

On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 04:16:50PM -0300, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
Zbyszek

Re: Update to 0ad-0.18

By =?ISO-8859-1?Q?... at 03/15/2015 - 16:58

2015-03-15 18:32 GMT-03:00 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < ... at in dot waw.pl>:
It was not a good idea to push 0ad with a build requires
that is not yet available (mozjs31), but otherwise, 0ad-0.17
would also fail to build until gloox is rebuilt.
I can remake a previous experimental patch if mozjs31
delays too much, to have a conditional on building with
bundled mozjs31, but that would be non default, as would
need fesco approval for the bundling.

Re: Update to 0ad-0.18

By Zbigniew =?utf-... at 03/15/2015 - 19:12

On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 06:58:27PM -0300, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
I rebuilt gloox in rawhide now.

Zbyszek