DevHeads.net

Postings by Luya Tshimbalanga

Need assistance to build knotter for Fedora

Following the request from Design team, I struggle to package Knotter
for review due to failure related to Qt5.

<a href="https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=21287726" title="https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=21287726">https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=21287726</a>

As I am not familiar with Qt5. Can someone help to fix the error please.
I attached the spec file for view. Knotter website is on
<a href="http://knotter.mattbas.org/" title="http://knotter.mattbas.org/">http://knotter.mattbas.org/</a>

Unable to bring new package to bodhi

For some odd reasons, I am unable to update via bodhi even though the
package is already built[1].

Is it a bug from the infrastructure as the database failed to list new
package [2]?

Reference

[1]
<a href="http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/search?type=package&amp;match=glob&amp;terms=gimp-luminosity-masks" title="http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/search?type=package&amp;match=glob&amp;terms=gimp-luminosity-masks">http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/search?type=package&amp;match=glob&amp;terms=...</a>

[2] <a href="https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gimp-luminosity-masks" title="https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gimp-luminosity-masks">https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gimp-luminosity-masks</a>

Rebuild for gmic to latest stable release

Upstream released[0] new version of gmic nearly two months ago and
bugzilla notified about the update[1]. Unfortunately I do not have
proven packager privilege to do the
change so is there anyone doing the update? Thanks in advance.

Reference

[0] <a href="http://gmic.eu/download.shtml" title="http://gmic.eu/download.shtml">http://gmic.eu/download.shtml</a>

[1] <a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321779" title="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321779">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321779</a>

State of Sparkleshare

As a maintainer of Fedora Design Suite, the state of sparkleshare brought attention with these outstanding report:
* <a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375789" title="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375789">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375789</a>
* <a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151172" title="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151172">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151172</a>

Considering the critical vulnerability of the dependent package webkitgtk, will it be possible for a proven package updating Sparkleshare to the latest stable release
as the Design Team depends on it?

Thanks,
Luya

Review swap: gimp-luminosity-masks

Hello team,

I am looking for a review swap for gimp-luminosity-masks:

<a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476440" title="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476440">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476440</a>

The package is very simple and easy to review.

Thanks in advance,

Making swatchbooker run

python2-lcms2 just landed in the repository

<a href="https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=24206" title="https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=24206">https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=24206</a>

Attempting to run swatcbooker resulted his error:

$ swatchbooker
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/share/swatchbooker/swatchbooker.pyw", line 27, in <module>
from sbcommon import *
File "/usr/share/swatchbooker/sbcommon.py", line 27, in <module>
from swatchbook import *
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/swatchbook/__init__.py", line
26, in <module>
from color import *
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/swatchbook/color.py", line 22,
in <module>

python-lcms2 looking for review

python-lcms2 is a dependency needed for swatchbooker due to upstream change.

<a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1449882" title="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1449882">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1449882</a>

The binding is only available for python2 and the spec files reflect that change. It is very trivial.
If needed, I will be willing to review a package as well.

Luya

Easy review: gimp-wavelet-decompose

Gimp-wavelet-decompose plugin for Gimp is looking for a trivial review.
<a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1447213" title="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1447213">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1447213</a>

swatchbooker

Hello team,

I am looking for swaping review with swatchbooker:

<a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441046" title="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441046">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441046</a>

An odd issue is the startup of the application with the correct path
within the binary leaving baffled. Improvement welcome.

Broken gcc-c++?

I just hit an issue when scratch building embree on either rawhide and F26:

<a href="https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=18532546" title="https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=18532546">https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=18532546</a>

Does anyone encounter similar problem?

Need testers for updated Blender

Hello AMD hardware testers,

Please test this updated Blender using upstream patch that resolved the
flickering issues on user interface happening on both Wayland and
Xserver affecting AMD users.

F25: <a href="https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-c4ee520d53" title="https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-c4ee520d53">https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-c4ee520d53</a>

F24: <a href="https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-e827f09c86" title="https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-e827f09c86">https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-e827f09c86</a>

Make sure to set

File → User Preferences → Window Draw Method: Automatic

See <a href="https://developer.blender.org/T49945" title="https://developer.blender.org/T49945">https://developer.blender.org/T49945</a> for more details.

Thank you in advance

patch refused to be applied

Hello team,

I applied a patch sent by upstream but some odd reason, the build kept
on failing

<a href="https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17472254" title="https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17472254">https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17472254</a>

I include the patch for preview so someone can see what went wrong.

Thanks

Need assistance to fix LuxRender issue

Hello team,

After investigating the bug [1] on LuxRender failing to start,
upstream[2] suggested a problem with qt4 configuration.

Attempt at building YafaRay

Here is an attempt at building YafaRay using scratch build:

<a href="https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17274673" title="https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17274673">https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17274673</a>

An issue is somehow OpenCV will not meet a requirement due to this error
below:

-- Found opencv, version 3.1.0
CMake Error at CMakeModules/FindOpenCV.cmake:120 (string):
string sub-command REGEX, mode REPLACE needs at least 6 arguments total to
command.

Using "" to work around the error inside "CMakeModules/FindOpenCV.cmake"
still produce a failure. Any pointer?

YafaRay

Looking for a reviewer about unretiring YafaRay which is still active
upstream. It may not be perfect but will need guidance to properly build
it. I will review a package in exchange as well.

<a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403600" title="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403600">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403600</a>

Blender failed to build on ppc64le

Greetings,

While building Blender to fix a minor bug on Rawhide, the failure
occurred on pp64le architecture. Other are unaffected because of the
success. In that case, can a maintainer of ppc64le architecture
addresses the issue? Otherwise, should I exclude ppc64le in the spec
file for the time being?

Suggestion welcome.

Ref:
<a href="http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16356920" title="http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16356920">http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16356920</a>
<a href="http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=1400" title="http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=1400">http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=1400</a>

Gnome Software fails to display some fonts

It appears Gnome Software fails to list fonts using validated metainfo
xml following upstream appstream standard
(<a href="https://freedesktop.org/software/appstream/docs/sect-Metadata-Fonts.html" title="https://freedesktop.org/software/appstream/docs/sect-Metadata-Fonts.html">https://freedesktop.org/software/appstream/docs/sect-Metadata-Fonts.html</a>)

I already file a bug
(<a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387403" title="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387403">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387403</a>). Could someone
investigate the cause?

Please rebuild OpenEXR against GCC 6.2

After investigating the issues related to FTBS on Blender, it turned out
the change from glibc cause OpenEXR to fail on Rawhide repository
according to koschei report:

<a href="https://apps.fedoraproject.org/koschei/package/blender" title="https://apps.fedoraproject.org/koschei/package/blender">https://apps.fedoraproject.org/koschei/package/blender</a>

I already filed the report on

<a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383552" title="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383552">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383552</a>

as applications using OpenEXR may be affected.

Blender failed to build on rawhide

Blender recently fails to build on rawhide as test via scratch build:
koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16032906

It seems somehow OpenEXR is broken according to the build.log

However, the build is successful on Fedora 25
<a href="http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16033093" title="http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16033093">http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16033093</a>

Can someone help investigating the root cause of the issue?

Assistance to build LuxRender 1.6

Attempting to build newer version led to a failure due cmake unable to
find LuxRay

<a href="http://paste.fedoraproject.org/439204/75260457/" title="http://paste.fedoraproject.org/439204/75260457/">http://paste.fedoraproject.org/439204/75260457/</a>

Yet the path correctly defined. I don't know if there is a mistake or a
bug to cmake.

Here is the source RPM as reference:

<a href="https://luya.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/LuxRender-1.6-1.fc26.src.rpm" title="https://luya.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/LuxRender-1.6-1.fc26.src.rpm">https://luya.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/LuxRender-1.6-1.fc26.src.rpm</a>

Need review f25-backgrounds package for beta release

Hi team,

Could someone do a review of f25-backgrounds before the beta freeze on
September 27?
It is a critical package because it contains the default wallpapers for
F25 release.

The link is <a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378971" title="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378971">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378971</a>

Thanks in advance.

Review swap: Grand Hotel and Molot fonts

Hello team,

I am looking for reviewers on those fonts needed for Fedora Magazine
template:

Grand Hotel (<a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368606" title="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368606">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368606</a>)
Molot (<a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368611" title="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368611">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368611</a>)

I have contacted the author of Molot fonts who okay for the licensing.

Thanks in advance.

Needs advice on using ExclusiveArch or ExcludeArch

I am currently packaging embree [0] which is required by recent release
of LuxRender. The bad news is embree
(<a href="https://embree.github.io/downloads.html" title="https://embree.github.io/downloads.html">https://embree.github.io/downloads.html</a>) is only
available for 64 bits architectures meaning all others i.e. i686[1] and
armv7hl[2] will fail to build.

Either i have to use ExclusiveArch or ExcludeArch parameter in spec
file. Advice needed.

References
[0] <a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364618" title="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364618">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364618</a>
[1] <a href="http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15166172" title="http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15166172">http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15166172</a>
[2] <a href="http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15166100" title="http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15166100">http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15166100</a>

Intel Embree files needed to build LuxRender

Hello team,
I attempt to build LuxRender[0] when this issue occurred[1]

CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:103 (MESSAGE):
--> Could not locate required Intel Embree files - Please check

Which package provides them?

Reference
Luya

Status of Blender 3D

Blender 3D is now updated to the latest upstream starting from Fedora 24
and up.

<a href="https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/blender" title="https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/blender">https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/blender</a>

The bad news is Fedora 23 and EPEL 7 and down which will not get that
update due to python3 requiring 3.5 version as minimum[1][2] missing on
those release.

Please test the update to make sure there is no further issue.

Reference

Taking ownership of YafaRay

Greetings,
I would like to take ownership on recently retired package YafaRay[1]
Do I need to submit a re-review considering the two weeks notice hasn't
reached yet?
I noticed upstream now their recent version as experimental: yafaray.org

What will be the suggestion

[1] <a href="https://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/YafaRay.git" title="https://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/YafaRay.git">https://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/YafaRay.git</a>

About dnf failing to honore conditional level in comps.xml

dnf has issues at honoring conditional levels written on comps.xml.

As a result, some packages will not be installed by either anaconda or
livemedia build system.

I have already submitted a bug report on the subject [1] but it was too
deep to fix for Fedora 24.

By the time of applying the workaround, the freeze was in the process
and the suggested change to manually update the kickstart and some
comps.xml came too late. That was the case with Design Suite and
surprisingly other groups.

Review swap requested

Hello team,

I am willing to do a review in exchange of the following packages:

gimp-layer-via-copy

<a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329923" title="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329923">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329923</a>

radeontop:

<a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089962" title="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089962">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089962</a>

Thanks in advance,

Unresponsive maintainer: Ewan Mac Mahon

I vainly attempted to contact gimp-resynthesizer maintainer[0] for two week to update the plugin to the latest
upstream version according to release monitoring[1]. I sent a needinfo to the right email address according to his
FAS account without reply. Is there another way to contact Ewan to push the latest update?

Can also a proven packager push upstream update while the current maintainer is away and unresponsive for a while?

Reference

Ownership of gimpfx-foundry

Hello team,
gimpfx-foundry is back to Fedora repository. Step to do is to get other branches unblocked as I am unable to build the package
at the moment <a href="http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13836521" title="http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13836521">http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13836521</a>

The package database showed the status is approved. I filed the ticket about the issue but I am not sure if
the system automatically unblocks the branches. <a href="https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6404#comment:1" title="https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6404#comment:1">https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6404#comment:1</a>

What are the remaining step to fully enable all active branches?

Thanks in advance.